Cracks and Fault Lines: Foreign Policy Orientations of Western Balkan Capitals in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-3-90-153-179
Abstract
The Ukrainian crisis has reverberated throughout the troubled region of the Balkans in Southern Europe, exposing deep-seated cracks and fractures that have long characterized this geopolitical area. The crisis has not only highlighted divisions between local states but also between communities and ethno-religious groups. In many cases, these intraregional contradictions are exacerbated by external actors and their demands. This article examines the foreign policy priorities and orientations of Western Balkan capitals within the "five plus one" format states (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, and the partially recognized "Republic of Kosovo") in light of the crisis in Ukraine, illustrating the interplay between regional dynamics and international crises.
Drawing on a wide range of sources, including official documents and opinion polls on foreign policy, this paper identifies regional discrepancies in the perception and assessment of the ongoing Ukrainian conflict. The study employs a historical-systemic approach and neorealism principles to discern potential directions for political institutions in the external context. The analysis reveals that a fragile "balance of threats" persists in the region, heavily influenced by the goals and interests of external actors such as the EU, NATO, the United States, Russia, and to a lesser extent, China and Turkey.
The military and political disengagement observed in 2022 mirrors the alignment of local players witnessed in 2014, but with a significant difference: the West now expects all participants in the "five plus one" format to fully adhere to their joint foreign policy, including implementing restrictive measures against the Russian Federation. This presents a challenging dilemma for Belgrade and Banja Luka, as they cannot overlook the widespread support for Russia's actions among the Serbian population. Any anti-Russian steps taken by local authorities may lead to serious internal political conflicts in both Serbia and Republika Srpska, with far-reaching implications for regional stability.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. S. Arlyapova
Institute of System-Strategic Analysis (ISSA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena S. Arlyapova – PhD (Political Science)
Russia, 16, Kuskovskaya St., Moscow, 111398
E. G. Ponomareva
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Relations of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena G. Ponomareva – Doctor of Political Science, Professor
Russia, 76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 1194547
References
1. Arlyapovа E., Ponomareva E., Prorokovic D. 2022. NATO’s Capabilities in Global Governance: On the Balkan Scene. International Organisations Research Journal. 17(2). Р. 208-223. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-09
2. Austin R.C. 2006. Greater Albania: The Albanian Case and the Question of Kosovo, 1912– 2001 (Ch. 9). Ideologies and National Identities: The Case of Twentieth-Century Southeastern Europe. New Edition (online). Budapest: Central European University Press.
3. F.N.-B. 1952. The Albanian Mystery: Russia’s Least-Known Satellite. The World Today (Royal Institute of International Affairs). 8(11). P. 466-473.
4. Hodge C. 2010. Britain and the Balkans: 1991 until the presents. Routledge. 314 p.
5. Lampe J., Mazower M. 2006. Ideologies and National Identities: The Case of TwentiethCentury Southeastern Europe. New Edition (online). Budapest: Central European University Press. 320 p.
6. Stepić M. 2020. Kosovo i Metohija: Geopolitički Aspekti Brzog Rešenja i Zamrznutog Konflikta. Nacionalni interes. XVI(38). (In Serbian)
7. Stronski P. 2022. Russia in the Balkans after Ukraine: A Troubling Actor. Carnegie Politika. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/87959
8. Walt S.M. 2013. The Origins of Alliance. New York: Cornell University Press. 336 p. Waltz K.N. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press. 251 p.
9. Dutkevich P. 2022. Grandiozny`j raskol [A Tremendous Split]. Russia in Global Affairs. 20(6). P. 22-34. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-6-22-34 (In Russian)
10. Entina E.G. 2022. Nezapadny`e Balkany [The Non-Western Balkans]. Moscow: Galaktika, ID «Zebra E». 656 p. (In Russian)
11. Fenenko A.V. 2019. Neorealizm v politicheskoj teorii. Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka: Metodologiya [Neorealism in Political Theory. Contemporary Political Science: Methodology]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. P. 61-83. (In Russian)
12. Gus`kova E.Y. 2003. Albanskoe secessionistskoe dvizhenie v Kosove [The Albanian Secession Movement in Kosovo]. The Albanian factor of crisis in the Balkans. Moscow: INION RAN. P. 7-50. (In Russian)
13. Iskenderov P.A. 2012. «Velikaya Albaniya»: teoriya i praktika [The “Great Albania”: Theory and Practice]. History issues. No1. P. 31-46. (In Russian)
14. Iskenderov P.A. 2015. Problema Kosovo: istoriografiya mifov [The Kosovo Problem: Historiography of the Myths]. Slavs and Russia. No1. Р. 269-302. (In Russian)
15. Kaloeva E.B. 2016. Zapadnye Balkany i krizis v Ukraine [The Western Balkans and the Crisis in Ukraine]. Strany` Vostochnoj Evropy` i ukrainskij krizis (2013–2015). Moscow: INION RAN. P. 29-54. (In Russian)
16. Kandel` P. 2018. Chto novogo v strategii na Zapadny`x Balkanax? [What is New in the Strategy in the Western Balkans?] Contemporary Europe. No5. P. 17-24. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope520181724 (In Russian)
17. Kiyasov A.S. 2010. «Zavershaya nachatuyu rabotu»: politika respublikanskoj administracii SShA na Zapadny`x Balkanax v 2000-e gody. [“Having the Started Work Done”: the U.S. Republican Administration Policy Towards the Western Balkans in the 2000-s]. Vestnik of Samara State University. No79. P. 79-83. (In Russian)
18. Kiyasov A.S. 2012. Vneshnepoliticheskij kurs SShA na Zapadny`x Balkanax (19902000e gg.) [The U.S. Foreign Policy Course in the Western Balkans (1990–2000s)]. PhD papers. Kazan’. 258 p. (In Russian)
19. Knyazeva S.E. 2021. Problema vstupleniya v ES Balkanskix stran i rasshireniya ES v kontekste cennostnoj modeli Evropejskogo Soyuza [The Problem of the EU Integration of the Balkan Countries and the EU Enlargement in the Context of the Value Model of the European Union]. Current problems of Europe. 2(110). P. 176-193. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2021.02.08 (In Russian)
20. Korenev E.S. 2017. Albanskij faktor v regional`noj strategii NATO na Balkanax v 19902000e gody [The Albanian Factor in NATO’s Regional Strategy in the Balkans in 1990–2000s]. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. History and International Relations. 17(1). P. 92-98. DOI: 10.18500/1819-4907-2017-17-1-92-98 (In Russian)
21. Milyo P. 2002. «Velikaya Albaniya»: fikciya ili realnost`? [The “Great Albania”: Fiction or Reality?] The Albanian crisis factor in the Balkans. Moscow: INION RAN. P. 125-145. (In Russian)
22. Nikulin A.A. 2018. Princip «etnichnosti» vo vneshnej politike Velikobritanii i kosovskij krizis 1999 goda [The Principle of “Ethnicity” in Foreign Policy of Great Britain and the Kosovo Crisis of 1999]. Bulletin of State and Municipal Administration. 3(29). P. 70-78.
23. Ponomareva E. 2020. Quo Vadis, Serbia? Russia in Global Affairs. 1(69). January/March. Р. 158-179. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-158-179\
24. Ponomareva E.G. 2018. Albanskij faktor destabilizacii Zapadnyh Balkan: scenarny`j podhod [The Albanian Factor of Destabilization in the Western Balkans: the Scenario Approach]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(59). P. 99-124. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-259-99-124 (In Russian)
25. Ponomareva E.G., Kry`kanov D.D. 2020. Balkanskoe dyhanie Pekina. Strategiya i taktika kitajskogo prisutstviya v stranax Zapadnyh Balkan [The Beijing’s Balkan Breath: Strategy and Tactics of Chinese Presence in the Western Balkans Countries]. Politeia. 1(96). P. 117-137. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-96-1-117-137 (In Russian)
26. Shherbak I. 2021. Zapadnye Balkany v strategii Evrosoyuza [The Western Balkans in the EU Strategy]. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe. No 3. P. 41-71. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran320214147 (In Russian)
27. Terzich S. 2015. Staraya Serbiya (XIX-XX vv.). Drama odnoj evropejskoj civilizacii [The Old Serbia (19–20th Centuries). The drama of one European Civilization]. Moscow: Veche. 480 p. (In Russian)
28. Turov N.L. 2014. Ideologicheskij proekt «Velikaya Albaniya» na sovremennoj politicheskoj karte mira [The “Great Albania” Ideological Project on Modern Political World Map]. Comparative Politics. 4(17). P. 39-44. (In Russian)
29. Vinogradov V.N. 1991. Britanskij lev na Bosfore [British Lion on the Bosphorus]. Moscow: Nauka. 160 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Arlyapova E.S., Ponomareva E.G. Cracks and Fault Lines: Foreign Policy Orientations of Western Balkan Capitals in the Context of the Ukrainian Crisis. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(3):153-179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-3-90-153-179
Views:
621
Email this article 