Ideas of Multipolarity in the Conceptual Frame of the Soviet Diplomacy during the Final Phases of the Great Patriotic war (1943–1945)
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-6-93-124-152
Abstract
This article endeavors to delineate the conceptual landscape occupied by the notions of prospective multipolarity within the strategic discourse of Soviet diplomacy during the latter phases of the Great Patriotic War. Particular emphasis is placed on the intellectual contributions of two prominent Soviet diplomats, M.M. Litvinov and I.M. Maisky. The author substantiates these insights by drawing upon both published and archival source materials, including the diaries and records maintained by officials within the Soviet Foreign Office, as well as documents emanating from the "Litvinov commission."
While the diplomatic theories formulated by Litvinov and Maisky during the years 1943–1945 have been subject to analysis by Russian and international scholars, the majority of extant scholarship has traditionally focused on the content and nuances of their perspectives on specific international "questions." Departing from this convention, this article adopts a methodological approach that seeks to explore the underlying conceptual foundations upon which the ideas of Litvinov and Maisky were constructed. Additionally, the essay introduces a novel dimension by surveying the viewpoints of other Soviet diplomats (S.A. Lozovskii, B.E. Shtein, Ia.Z. Surits, E.V. Tarle), who have garnered relatively less scholarly attention.
Of paramount interest is the manner in which Litvinov and Maisky envisaged the post-World War II international landscape, albeit without explicitly employing the term "multipolarity." The article addresses critical questions, such as their perception of the global scenario following WWII, their consideration of the inevitability of Soviet-American bipolarity, and the factors and circumstances that influenced their conceptualizations. The contemporary resurgence of discussions surrounding the trajectory of multipolarity in the twenty-first century underscores the pertinence of this historical inquiry.
The article's key conclusion posits that the conceptual framework embraced by Soviet diplomats during 1943–1945 was not centered on notions of bipolarity or an imminent Cold War. While acknowledging the potential escalation of tensions between the USSR and Western nations led by the USA and Great Britain, they favored collaboration among the principal powers of the antiHitlerite coalition, grounded in an implicit understanding of their respective "spheres of influence." Although Soviet Foreign Office officials did not discount the possibility of the formation of a united Anglo-American front against the USSR, they believed that Soviet diplomacy should actively work to prevent such an outcome by capitalizing on the fissures between Washington and London.
About the Author
I. E. MagadeevRussian Federation
Iskander E. Magadeev – Candidate of Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of European and American Studies
119454, Moscow, prospekt Vernadskogo, 76
References
1. Kissinger H.A. 1969. American Foreign Policy: Three Essays. New York: W.W. Norton. 143 p.
2. Roberts G. 1999. Ideology, Calculation, and Improvisation: Spheres of Influence and Soviet Foreign Policy 1939–1945. Review of International Studies. 25(4). P. 655–673.
3. Roberts G. 2002. Litvinov’s Lost Peace, 1941–1946. Journal of Cold War Studies. 4(2). P. 23–54.
4. Roberts G. 2006. Stalin’s Wars: from World War to Cold War, 1939–1953. New Haven; London: Yale UP. 468 p.
5. Roberts G. 2011. Moscow’s Cold War on the Periphery: Soviet Policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943–8. Journal of Contemporary History. 46(1). P. 58–81.
6. Schweller R.L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia UP. 267 p.
7. Wohlforth W. 1993. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell UP. 317 p.
8. Afiani V.Iu. 2016. Problemy reparatsii na Ialtinskoi konferentsii. Po dokumentam lichnogo fondaI.M. Maiskogo v arkhive RAN [The Reparations Issue on the Crimea (Yalta) Conference: On Documents from the Personal Provenance Fond of Ivan M. Maysky in the Archive of the Russian
9. Academy of Sciences]. Vestnik arkhivista. 5(14). P. 45–47. (InRussian)
10. Aganson O.I. et al. 2020. Vtoraia mirovaia voina i transformatsiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: ot mnogopoliarnosti k bipoliarnomu miru [Second World War and Transformation of International Relations: from Multipolarity to Bipolar World]. Ed. by L.S. Belousov, A.S. Manykin. Moscow: MGU. 885 p. (In Russian)
11. Ageev A.I. et al. 2014. Velikaia Otechestvennaia voina 1941–1945 godov [Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945]. T. 8. Ed. by V.G. Titov et al. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. 864 p. (In Russian)
12. Anichkina V.S. et al. 1979. Sovremennye vneshnepoliticheskie kontseptsii SShA [Contemporary Foreign Policy Conceptions of the USA]. Moscow: Nauka. 381 p. (In Russian)
13. Arzakanian M.T. 2010. SSSR i griadushchaia pobeda soiuznikov v voine: vzgliad iz Velikobritanii [The USSR and the Allies’ Forthcoming Victory in the War: A View from Great Britain). MGIMO Review of International Relations. 5(14). P. 45–47. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2010-5-14-45-47 (In Russian)
14. Balandina O.A., Davydov A.Iu. 2020. Vlast’, informatsiia i obshchestvo: ikh vzaimosviazi v deiatel’nosti Sovetskogo informbiuro v usloviiakh Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Power, Information and Society in the Framework of the Soviet Information Bureau’s Activities during the Great Patriotic war]. Saint Petersburg: Evraziia. 320 p. (In Russian)
15. Baryshnikov V.N., Plenkov O.Iu. 2015. Diplomat B.E. Shtein i sovetsko-finliandskie otnosheniia serediny 1930-kh gg. [Diplomat B.E. Shtein and the Soviet-Finnish Relations in the mid-1930s]. Trudy Kafedry istorii Novogo i noveishego vremeni [Transactions of the Department of Modern and Contemporary History]. Vol. 15. Saint Petersburg: SPbGU Publ. P. 79–103. (In Russian)
16. CarleyM.J. Tainaiavoina: Zapad protiv Rossii, 1917–1930 [Secret War: West against Russia, 1917–1930]. Mosow: Istoricheskaia literatura. 768 p. (In Russian)
17. Filitov A.M. 2023. Germaniia v sovetskom vneshnepoliticheskom planirovanii (1941–1990) [Germany in the Soviet Foreign Policy Planning (1941–1990)]. Moscow: Iurait. 316 p. (In Russian)
18. FilitovA.M. 1995. V komissiiakh Narkomindela… (In the Commissions of the Soviet Foreign Office…) Vtoraia mirovaia voina. Aktual’nye problemy [Second World War. Topical Problems]. Ed. by. O.A. Rzheshevskii. Moscow: Nauka. P. 54–71. (In Russian)
19. Gorozii V.S. 2018. Komissiia M.M. Litvinova po podgotovke mirnykh dogovorov i poslevoennogo ustroistva: plany v otnoshenii Zapadnoi Evropy [M.M. Litvinov’s Commission on Preparation of the Peace Treaties and Post-War Settlement: Plans in Regard of Western Europe]. Klio. 6(138). P. 123–128. (In Russian)
20. Iakovlev A.G. 1990. Vneshniaia politika KNR: problemy issledovaniia v svete novogo myshleniia [Foreign Policy of the PRC: Problems of Studying in the Light of New Thinking]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka. №2. P. 99–107. (In Russian)
21. Iakovlev N.N. et al. 1976. SShA: politicheskaia mysl’ i istoriia [USA: Political Thought and History]. Ed. by N.N. Iakovlev. Moscow: Nauka. 617 p. (In Russian)
22. Islamov T.M., Pokivailova T.A. 2008. Vostochnaia Evropa v silovom pole velikikh derzhav. Transil’vanskii vopros. 1940–1946 gody [Eastern Europe in the Force Field of Great Powers. Transylvanian Question. 1940–1946]. Moscow: Indrik. 240 p. (In Russian)
23. Kaganovich B.S. 2000. E.V. Tarle v Komissii po voprosam mirnykh dogo-vorov i poslevoennogo ustroistva (1943–1945 gg.) [E.V. Tarle in the Commission of Peace Treaties and Post-War Settlement (1943–1945)]. Problemy vsemirnoi istorii: sb. st. v chest’ akademika A.A. Fursenko [Essays on World History: Dedicated to Academician A.A. Fursenko]. Ed. by B.V. Anan’ich. Saint Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin. P. 351–360. (In Russian)
24. Kaganovich B.S. 2014. Evgenii Viktorovich Tarle. Istorikivremia [Evgenii Viktorovich Tarle. Historian and Time]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta. 357 p. (In Russian)
25. Khakhalkina E.V., Zhigalov B.S. 2019. «Zvezdnyi chas» posla I.M. Maiskogo (iiun' 1941 – iiul' 1943 gg.) [The “Finest Hour” of the Ambassador I.M. Maisky (June 1941 – July 1943)]. Voprosy istorii. №12. P. 27–43. DOI: 10.3116/VoprosyIstorii201912Statyi24 (In Russian)
26. Khlebnikov P.P. 1984. Neob’’iavlennye voiny SShA [Undeclared US Wars]. Moscow: Mysl’. 271 p. (In Russian)
27. Kholodkovskii K.G. 1991. Mezhdu istinoi i skhemoi [Between Truthand Scheme]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. №7. P. 19–22. (In Russian)
28. Khromushin G.B. 1974. Sovremennyi mir i ideologicheskaia bor’ba [Contemporary World and Ideological Battles]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 197 p. (In Russian)
29. Kokoshin A.A. 1978. O burzhuaznykh prognozakh razvitiia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [About Bourgeois Forecasts on Development of International Relations]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 230 p. (In Russian)
30. Kunina A.E. 1988. SShA: metodologicheskie problemy istoriografii (praktika issledovanii) [USA: Methodological Problems of Historiography (Practice of Research)]. Moscow: Nauka, 212 p. (In Russian)
31. Magadeev I.E. 2020. «Uroki voiny» i strategicheskoe planirovanie derzhav «Bol'shoi troiki» (1945–1949). [Lessons of World War II and Strategic Planning of the Big Three]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika. 12(3). P. 45–84. DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-3-45-84 (In Russian)
32. Magadeev I.E. 2023. Prakticheskaia istoriografiia: E.V. Tarle i diskussii po «frantsuzskomu voprosu» v NKID SSSR (1943–1944) [Practical Historiography: E.V. Tarle and Discussions on the “French Question” in the Soviet Foreign Office (1943–1944)]. Noveishaia istoriia Rossii. 13(2). P. 363–375. DOI: 10.21638/spbu24.2023.207 (In Russian)
33. Narinskii M.M. 2010. Sovetskoe rukovodstvo i problema granits i sfery vliianiia SSSR v 1941–1946 gg. (Soviet State, Frontiers and Spheres of Influence in 1941–1946) 65 let Velikoi Pobedy [Great Victory: 65 Years Ago]. Ed. by A.V. Torkunov, S.E. Naryshkin. T. 3. Moscow: MGIMO-University. P. 52–61. (In Russian)
34. Pechatnov V.O. 2006. Stalin, Ruzvel’t, Trumen: SSSR I SShA v 1940-kh gg.: Dokumental’nye ocherki [Stalin, Roosevelt and Truman: USSR and USA in the 1940s. A Documental Study]. Moscow: TERRA–Knizhnyi klub. 752 p. (In Russian)
35. Pechatnov V.O. 2009. Uroki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny v voenno-politicheskom planirovanii SShA i SSSR na poslevoennyi period [Lessons of the Second World War in the American and Soviet Military and Political Planning for the Post-War Period]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika. №1. P. 116–133. (In Russian)
36. Pechatnov V.O. 2010. Posol SSSR v Velikobritanii I.M. Maisky: Po stranitsam ego dnevnikovykh zapisei [USSR Ambassador to Great Britain I.M. Maisky: Basing on His Diaries]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia. №3. P. 187–199. (In Russian)
37. Pechatnov V.O. 2013. Stalingradskaia bitva i problema vtorogo fronta [The Battle of Stalingrad and the Second Front Problem]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2(29). P. 86–94. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2013-2-29-86-94 (In Russian)
38. Petrovskii V.F. 1976. Amerikanskaia vneshnepoliticheskaia mysl’ [American Foreign Policy Thinking]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 333 p. (In Russian)
39. Pikhoia R.G. 2014. «Arkhivnaia revoliutsiia»: dvadtsat’ let spustia [“Archival Revolution”: Twenty Years Later]. Pt. 3. Arkheograficheskii ezhegodnik. Ed. by S.O. Shmidt. Moscow: Nauka. P. 4–22. (In Russian)
40. Pleshakov K. 1991. Nashi natsional’nye interesy v perekhodnyi period [Our National Interests during the Period of Transition]. Mezhdunarodnaia zhizn’. №10. P. 15–25. (In Russian)
41. Pozdeeva L.V. 2008. I.M. Maisky i A. Iden [I.M. Maisky and A. Eden]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia. №1. P. 171–184. (In Russian)
42. Pozharskaia S.P. 2004. I.M. Maisky. Portrety istorikov. Vremia i sud’by [Portraits of Historians. Time and Destinies]. Ed. by G.N. Sevost’ianov. T. 4. Moscow: Nauka. P. 282–302. (In Russian)
43. Primakov E.M. et al. 1983. Vostok: rubezh 80-kh godov. Osvobodivshiesia strany v sovremennom mire [Orient: on the Edge of the 1980s. Liberated Countries in the Contemporary World]. Moscow: Nauka. 269 p. (In Russian)
44. Sal’kov A.P. 2009. SSSR i Triestinskii krizis (mai – iiun’ 1945 g.) [USSR and Triest Crisis (May – June 1945)]. Pratsy gictarychnaga fakul’teta BDU: navuk. zb. Vol. 4. Ed. by U.K. Korshuk. Minsk: BGU. P. 128–141. (In Russian)
45. Sergunin A.A. 1989. SShA: prezidentskii lobbizm i vneshniaia politika [USA: Presidential Lobbying and Foreign Policy]. Moscow: Znanie. 63 p. (In Russian)
46. Sindeev A.A. 2020. Diplomaticheskii front Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny: kontury poslevoennoi Evropy v 1944 g. [The Diplomatic Front of the Great Patriotic War: the Contours of Post-war Europe in 1944] Sovremennaia Evropa. №3. P. 158–169. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope32020158169 (In Russian)
47. Sizonenko A.I. 1991. Polpred SSSR Ia.Z. Surits [Plenipotentiary Envoy Ia.Z. Surits]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia. №3. P. 100–117. (In Russian)
48. Sokolov V.V. 2001. I.M. Maisky mezhdu I.V. Stalinym i U. Cherchillem v pervye mesiatsy voiny [I.M. Maisky between I.V. Stalin and W. Churchill during the First Months of the War]. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia. №6. P. 18–31. (In Russian)
49. Sokolov V.V. 2002. M.M. Litvinov. Ocherki istorii Ministerstva inostrannykh del Rossii [Essays on History of the Russian Ministry for Foreign Affairs]. 1802–2002. T. 3. Ed. by I.S. Ivanov et al. Moscow: OLMA-Press. P. 340–353. (In Russian)
50. Trofimenko G.A. 1976. Skvoz’ prizmu «balansa sil» (kritika sovetologicheskikh kontseptsii sovetsko-amerikanskikh otnoshenii) (Through the “Balance of Power” Lens (Criticising the Sovietology’s Concepts about the Soviet-American Relations]. Problemy istorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i ideologicheskaia bor’ba [Problems of international relations’ history and ideological struggle]. Ed. by. A.O. Chubar’ian. Moscow: Nauka. P. 35–74. (In Russian)
51. Vatlin A.Iu., Lannik L.V. 2023. Vvedenie [Introduction]. Berlinskaia missiia polpreda Ioffe 1918 g. Dokumenty [Berlin Misision of Plenipotentiary Ioffe in 1918. Documents]. Ed. by A.Iu. Vatlin, L.V. Lannik and T. Penter. Moscow: Politicheskaia entsiklopediia. P. 3–95. (InRussian)
52. Zhigalov B.S. 2014. I.M. Maisky i problema germanskikh reparatsii (1943–1945 gg.) [I.M. Maisky and the Problem of German Reparations (1943–1945)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. History. 1(27). P. 56–63. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Magadeev I.E. Ideas of Multipolarity in the Conceptual Frame of the Soviet Diplomacy during the Final Phases of the Great Patriotic war (1943–1945). MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(6):124-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-6-93-124-152