BRICS as a Catalyst for Global Governance Transformation: Beyond Western Perceptions
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-1-94-46-64
Abstract
Scholarship on global political economy and global peace and security governance often depicts BRICS members as emerging powers with relatively limited experience in international leadership. These depictions underscore their contested regional leadership and ambiguous institutional, political, ideological, and socio-economic capacities to influence and reshape the global governance system. However, this article challenges some of these characterizations of BRICS members as inaccurate and rooted in Western exceptionalism. Employing a qualitative secondary research approach, it aims to analyze the role of BRICS as a new model for global governance by examining key institutional and political initiatives undertaken by the bloc, as well as by each of its member states.
The analysis reveals that institutional initiatives such as the New Development Bank (NDB) demonstrate the BRICS’ capacity to deploy a combination of hard and soft power tools, thereby contributing to the emergence of multipolarity in the global governance architecture. These initiatives have exposed the world's developing regions to new experiences, resources, and understandings of the priorities of emerging powers. Furthermore, political responses to crises, such as turmoil in Zimbabwe, Libya, and Mali, as well as nuclear issues in Iran, where BRICS members have assumed mediatory, supportive, or leading roles, have sparked renewed interest in understanding BRICS as an alternative to traditional conceptions of global peace and security governance. Significantly, BRICS’ soft power diplomacy plays a pivotal role in projecting the bloc as an advocate of alternative global governance architecture and in dispelling negative perceptions. This objective is achieved through the BRICS’ transformative agenda, which offers alternative pathways for attaining international public goods in developing regions with shared historical and ideological affinities.
About the Author
Dylan Yanano Mangani
Nelson Mandela University
South Africa
South Africa
Dylan Yanano Mangani – PhD in Political Science, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of History and Political Studies, School of Governmental and Social Sciences
Gqeberha (former Port Elizabeth), 6031, South Africa
References
1. Akchurina V., Della Sala V. 2018. The European Union, Russia and the Post-Soviet Space: Shared Neighbourhood, Battleground or Transit Zone on the New Silk Road? Europe-Asia Studies, 70(10): 1543-1551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1546490
2. Alden C. 2017. China and Africa. In: Routledge Handbook of African politics. Routledge. P. 414-425.
3. Allison G. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
4. Braga J.P., De Conti B., Magacho G. 2022. The New Development Bank (NDB) as a missionoriented institution for just ecological transitions: a case study approach to BRICS sustainable infrastructure investment. Revista Tempo do Mundo, No. 29. P. 139-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/ rtm29art5
5. Brands H. 2016. Making the Unipolar Moment: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Rise of the PostCold War Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6. Chakraborty S. 2018. Significance of BRICS: Regional powers, global governance, and the roadmap for the multipolar world. Emerging Economy Studies, 4(2): 182–191. https://doi. org/10.1177/2394901518795070
7. Chatin M., Gallarotti G. M. 2018. The BRICS and soft power: An Introduction. In: Emerging Powers in International Politics: The BRICS and Soft Power. New York: Routledge. P. 1-18.
8. Cooper A.F., Farooq A.B. 2013. BRICS and the Privileging of Informality in Global Governance. Global Policy, 4(4): 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12077
9. Duggan N., Azalia J. C., Rewizorski M. 2022. The structural power of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) in multilateral development finance: A New Development Bank case study. International Political Science Review, 43(4): 495-511. https://doi. org/10.1177/01925121211048297
10. Hirschman A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Havard University Press.
11. Hopewell K. 2017. The BRICS—merely a fable? Emerging power alliances in global trade governance. International Affairs, 93(6): 1377-1396. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix192
12. Khomyakov M. 2020. Russia: Colonial, anticolonial, postcolonial empire? Social Science Information, 59(2): 225-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018420929804
13. Lewis D.G. 2018. Geopolitical Imaginaries in Russian Foreign Policy: The Evolution of ‘Greater Eurasia’. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(10): 1612-1637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1515348
14. Los R. 2019. Soft Power of India. Historia i Polityka, 28(35): 9-23. https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2019.011
15. Mammo M., Gumede V., Oloruntoba S., Achu Check N., eds. 2017. Regenerating Africa: Bringing African Solutions to African Problems. Johannesburg: Africa Institute of South Africa.
16. Mangani D., Breakfast N. 2022. Implications of the Factional Politics in Zanu-PF & the ANC for Nation-building in Zimbabwe and South Africa, 2004 & 2017. Journal of Nation-building & Policy Studies (JoNPS), 6(1): 31-52.
17. Narozhna T. 2021. Revisiting the Causes of Russian Foreign Policy Changes: Western Recognition and Russia's Ontological Security-Seeking. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 15(2): 56–81. https://doi.org/10.51870/CEJISS.A150203
18. Nye J. S. 2008. Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1): 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
19. Nye J. S. 2021. Soft power: the evolution of a concept. Journal of Political Power, 14(1): 196208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879572 Viswanathan H.H.S., Mathur A., eds. 2021. The Future of BRICS. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.
20. Pant H. V. 2013. The BRICS fallacy. Washington Quarterly, 36(3): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2013.825552
21. Qoraboyev I. 2021. Global governance. In: Encyclopedia of Law and Development. Edward Elgar. P. 99-103.
22. Rewizorski M. 2018. BRICS and the New Multilateral Development Banks: Towards Recalibration of Global Economic Governance. Przegląd Strategiczny, Vol. 11. P. 281-298. https://doi. org/10.14746/ps.2018.1.20
23. Sarkar U. 2014. BRICS: An Opportunity for a Transformative South? South Asian Survey, 21(1-2): 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971523115592495
24. Sato A., Aboneaaj R., Morris S. 2021. How Effectively Is the Asian Development Bank Responding to COVID-19? An Early Assessment. Washington DC: Centre for Global Development.
25. Taherdoost H. 2021. Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1): 10-38.
26. Thampi M., ed. 2017. India and China in the colonial world. Routledge.
27. Troitskiy M. 2015. BRICS Approaches to Security Multilateralism. Air and Space Power Journal, 6(2): 76-88.
28. Van Noort C. 2019. The Construction of Power in the Strategic Narratives of the BRICS. Global Society, 33(4): 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2019.1581733
29. Yurlov F. 2006. Challenges of a globalised and unipolar world. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 10(3): 56-71.
30. Zhu, K. & Yang, R., 2023. Emerging Resources of China’s Soft Power: A Case Study of Cambodian Participants from Chinese Higher Education Programs. Higher Education Policy, Vol. 36. P. 633-655. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00278-w
Review
For citations:
Yanano Mangani D. BRICS as a Catalyst for Global Governance Transformation: Beyond Western Perceptions. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2024;17(1):46-64. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-1-94-46-64
Views:
1130
Email this article 