Cyclical Inclusive Growth Model of the European Union

This article analyzes the distinctive features of the contemporary cyclical inclusive growth model within the European Union (EU). As an integration entity, the EU contends with a series of internal challenges that impede its development, arising from the divergent economic interests of member states and the uneven distribution of the costs and benefits of the 'twin transition' in the context of Europe’s declining global competitiveness. Exploring the nuances of inclusive growth in the EU, particularly the role of citizen participation in societal progress, offers a valuable framework for understanding the social and economic contradictions both within and between member states. The study commences with a critical review of existing definitions of inclusive growth, laying the groundwork for an in-depth analysis of the EU model.
The research employs quantitative methods to compare EU member states using the UNCTAD Inclusive Growth Index and additional indicators of social and economic development and well-being. It also evaluates the outcomes of the 'Europe 2020' strategy, which aimed to establish inclusive growth targets for the EU by 2020. The findings reveal that the highest levels of inclusive growth are concentrated in northern and continental European countries, whereas Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) exhibit significantly lower levels. The analysis further uncovers key contradictions, such as the tension between reducing socio-economic inequality and promoting economic growth, the generational conflict over the ‘green economy,’ and the misalignment of interests between smaller and larger EU economies.
Despite the initiatives under the 'Europe 2020' strategy, the study observes a shift in the priorities of EU citizens concerning inclusive growth. The research identifies fundamental characteristics of the EU's inclusive growth model, marked by a cycle of emerging and resolving social and economic contradictions at the Union level. A notable aspect of this model is the increasing complexity and multiplicity of contradictions, alongside a growing emphasis on subjective well-being and the fulfillment of intangible individual needs. The insights derived from this analysis have practical implications for developing inclusive growth support measures within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and can aid in defining priorities and mechanisms for the social and economic policies of EAEU member states.

1. Barnat N. et al. 2019. Inclusive Growth of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States: Assessments and Opportunities. Eurasian Economic Commission. UNCTAD, EEC. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30267.36649

2. Bughin J. et al. 2018. Testing the Resilience of Europe’s Inclusive Growth Model. McKinsey Global Institute.

3. Che Sulaiman N.F., Ab-Hamid M.F., Ridzuan A.R. 2021. Inclusive Growth: Comprehensive Dimension of Income Distribution. Èkonomika Regiona. 17(1). P. 301–317. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-23

4. Darvas Z., Wolff G.B. 2016. An Anatomy of Inclusive Growth in Europe. Brussels, Bruegel. 114 p.

5. Demertzis M., Sapir A., Wolff G. B. 2019. Promoting Sustainable and Inclusive Growth and Convergence in the European Union. Bruegel Policy Contribution. №7. Bruegel, Brussels.

6. Ianchovichina, E., Lundstrom, S. 2009. Inclusive Growth Analytics: Framework and Application. Policy Research Working Paper. №4851. Washington, DC, World Bank, 40.

7. Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. (eds.). 2016. Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Wiley-Blackwell. 224 p.

8. Kjøller-Hansen A.O., Lindbjerg Sperling L. 2020. Measuring Inclusive Growth Experiences: Five Criteria for Productive Employment. Review of Development Economics. №4. P. 1413–1429. DOI: 10.1111/rode.12689

9. Klasen S. 2010. Measuring and Monitoring Inclusive Growth: Multiple Definition, Open Questions and Some Constructive Proposals. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

10. Levitas R. 2005. The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, second edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 223 p. DOI: 10.1057/9780230511552.

11. Mamman S. O. 2023. Response of Inclusive Growth to Development Aid in Africa and the Role of ICT Diffusion. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 22(4). P. 770–788. DOI: 10.15826/ vestnik.2023.22.4.031.

12. Mamman S.O., Sohag K. 2023. Inclusive Growth and Structural Transformation: The role of Innovation and Digitalisation Spillover. Economy of regions. 19(3). P. 598–611. DOI: 10.17059/ekon. reg.2023-3-1

13. Mascherini M., Ludwinek A., Ledermaier S. 2015. Social Inclusion of Young People. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2806/588575.

14. McKinley T. 2010. İnclusive Growth Criteria and Indicators: An Inclusive Growth Index for Diagnosis of Country Progress. ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series. Asian Development Bank. June. №14.

15. Ostry J.D., Loungani P., Berg A. 2019. Confronting Inequality: How Societies Can Choose Inclusive Growth. Foreword by J.E. Stiglitz. New York: Columbia University Press. 192 p. DOI: 10.7312/ ostr17468

16. Ranieri R., Almeida Ramos R. 2013. Inclusive Growth: Building up a Concept. Working Paper. №104. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPCIG).

17. Rauniyar G., Kanbur R. 2009. Inclusive Growth and Inclusive Development: A Review and Synthesis of Asian Development Bank Literature. Occasional Paper №8. ADB, Independent Evaluation Department.

18. Sachs J. D. 2005. Can Extreme Poverty Be Eliminated? Scientific American. 3(293). Р. 56–65. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0905-56

19. Saha A., Ciarli, T. 2018. Innovation, Structural Change, and Inclusion. A Cross Country PVAR Analysis. SWPS 201-01. 62 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3107748

20. Samans R., Blanke J., Hanouz M.D., Corrigan G. 2017. The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

21. Silander D. 2024. Europe 2020: The EU Commission and Political Entrepreneurship. International Studies. 29(1). P. 103–118. DOI: 10.18778/1641-4233.29.07.

22. Stec M., Grzebyk M. 2018. The Implementation of the Strategy Europe 2020 Objectives in European Union Countries: the Concept Analysis and Statistical Evaluation. Quality & Quantity. 52(1). P. 119–133. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0454-7

23. Stiglitz J. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 523 p.

24. Wandel J. 2016. The Role of Government and Markets in the Strategy “Europe 2020” of the European Union: a Robust Political Economy Analysis. International Journal of Management and Economic. 49(1). P. 7–33. DOI: 10.1515/ ijme-2016-0002/

25. White W.R. 2012. Policy Debate: How Do You Make Growth More Inclusive? L. de Mello, M.A. Dutz (eds.). Promoting Inclusive Growth: Challenges and Policies, Paris, OECD Publishing. P. 279–283.

26. Andrievskaya V.B. 2015. Effektivnost' gosudarstvennogo upravleniya kak neobhodimaya predposylka inklyuzivnogo rosta ekonomiki [Public Administration Efficiency as a Necessary Prerequisite for Inclusive Economic Growth]. Idei i ideally. 1(23). P. 90–101. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2015-1.2-90-101 (In Russian)

27. Burganov R.T. 2022. Ocenka vliyaniya cifrovoj transformacii na formirovanie inklyuzivnoj modeli ekonomicheskogo rosta regiona [Assessing the Impact of Digital Transformation on the Formation of an Inclusive Model of Regional Economic Growth]. Modern Economy Success. №5. P. 92–101. (In Russian)

28. Burganov R.T., El'shin L.A., SHarapov A.R. 2022. Koncepciya inklyuzivnogo rosta kak mekhanizm obespecheniya ustojchivogo razvitiya nacional'noj ekonomiki [The Concept of Inclusive Growth as a Mechanism for Ensuring Sustainable Development of the National Economy]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 12(10). P. 2623–2639. DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.10.116352 (In Russian)

29. Kazakova A.A. 2016. Inklyuzivnyj rost: problema sociologicheskoj konceptualizacii [Inclusive Growth: The Problem of Sociological Conceptualization]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. №4. P. 33–36. (In Russian)

30. Kondratyeva N.B. 2019. Koncepcii i indikatory inklyuzivnogo rosta Evropejskogo Soyuza: dvadcat' let spustya [Concepts and Indicators of Inclusive Growth of the European Union: Twenty Years Later]. Vestnik Universiteta mirovyh civilizacij. 10(25). P. 49–53. (In Russian)

31. Mamedov O.YU. 2017. Ekonomika inklyuzivnoj civilizacii [Economy of an Inclusive Civilization]. Terra Economicus. 15(3). P. 6–18. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-3-6-18 (In Russian)

32. Nechitajlo I.S., Kalamkovich M., Nazarkin P.A. 2019. Inklyuzivnyj rost kak faktor narashchivaniya chelovecheskogo kapitala obshchestva: mezhdisciplinarnyj analiz nekotoryh bar'erov inklyuzivnoj praktiki [Inclusive Growth as a Factor in Increasing the Human Capital of Society: an Interdisciplinary Analysis of Some Barriers to Inclusive Practice]. Istoricheskaya i social'noobrazovatel'naya mysl'. 11(6). P. 190–202. DOI: 10.17748/2075-9908-2019-11-6-190-202 (In Russian)

33. Nesterova O.A., Sanfirova O.V., Petrova T.A. 2022. Inklyuzivnyj sub’ekt v kontekste ekonomicheskogo rosta [Inclusive Subject in the Context of Economic Growth]. Voprosy innovacionnoj ekonomiki. 12(1). P. 209–221. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.1.114265 (In Russian)

34. Novikov A.I., Vitkina M.K. 2018. Inklyuzivnaya ekonomika i social'naya otvetstvennost' v regionah mira: dilemma ili obshchestvennoe soglasie [Inclusive Economy and Social Responsibility in the Regions of the World: Dilemma or Public Consent]. Regional'naya ekonomika i upravlenie: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2(54). P. 1–11. (In Russian)

35. Pahomova N.V., Rihter K.K., Malyshkov G.B. 2016. Inklyuzivnyj ustojchivyj rost i strategiya novoj industrializacii: institucional'nye ramki dlya soglasovaniya [Inclusive Sustainable Growth and the Strategy of New Industrialization: Institutional Framework for Coordination]. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 1(123). P. 29–37. (In Russian)

36. Spens M. 2013. Sleduyushchaya konvergenciya. Budushchee ekonomicheskogo rosta v mire, zhivushchem na raznyh skorostyah [The Next Convergence. The Future of Economic Growth in a World Living at Different Speeds]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Gaidara. 336 p. (In Russian)

37. Voevodina E.V. 2023. Doverie kak bazovyj princip inklyuzivnoj ekonomiki: analiz konceptual'nyh i metodicheskih podhodov [Trust as a Basic Principle of an Inclusive Economy: Analysis of Conceptual and Methodological Approaches]. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 3(181). P. 38–43. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.3.5 (In Russian)