EU Foreign Policy Instruments in the Eastern Partnership Countries: From Development Aid to Military Assistance
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-6-99-205-229
Abstract
In 2022, the European Union (EU) took the unprecedented step of providing financial assistance for military purposes to a warring state, Ukraine, while also establishing mechanisms to incentivize member states to supply arms and military equipment to Kyiv. These measures, characterized as "hard instruments" of EU foreign policy, were developed in response to the "return of high-intensity warfare to Europe." This marked a significant departure from the EU’s traditional emphasis, particularly in the 2000s and 2010s, on non-military foreign policy tools. During that period, the EU took pride in achieving its objectives without recourse to force and deliberately avoided military pressure in international relations.
This article explores the concept of foreign policy instruments, categorizing them into hard, soft, and hybrid tools. It examines the EU’s repertoire of foreign policy instruments, distinguishing between its long-standing approaches and those recently developed. Through an analysis of EU policy documents, the article identifies the Union’s evolving interests in the Eastern Partnership countries—Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine—and evaluates the practical application of its tools in the region since the launch of the "Eastern Policy" (comprising the European Neighborhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership initiative).
The study concludes by analyzing the use of soft, hard, and hybrid instruments in the Eastern Partnership, outlining the nature of the transformations in EU foreign policy and hypothesizing their underlying causes. These changes in the EU’s foreign policy toolkit reveal broader trends in its strategic development and shed light on the specific dynamics of its engagement with six post-Soviet countries, which remain strategically significant for the EU while occupying a critical space within Russia’s sphere of interests.
Keywords
About the Author
O. V. ShishkinaRussian Federation
Olga V. Shishkina – Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of International Relations and Foreign Policy of Russia
76 Vernadsky Ave., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Adomeit H. 2011. Russia and Its Near Neighbourhood: Competition and Conflict with the EU.
2. College of Europe Natolin Campus. ISBN 978-83-63128-04-3. 75 p. URL: https://www.coleurope. eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/adomeit_0.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
3. Aydin M. 2018. Foreign Policy Instruments of States (Diplomacy, Propaganda, Economic Methods). Foreign Policy Analysis. Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Pp.146-181. E-ISBN 978-97506-2888-7. URL: https://ets.anadolu.edu.tr/storage/nfs/ULI209U/ebook/ULI209U-18V1S1-8-0-1SV1-ebook.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
4. Biscop S. 2022. Strategic Autonomy: Not Without Integration. FEPS Policy Brief. 15 p. URL: https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/publications/220113%20strategic_autonomy_sven_biscop.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
5. Deen B. Wouter Zw., van Loon I. 2021. The Eastern Partnership. Three dilemmas in a time of troubles. Clingendael Report. 37 p. URL: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/ the-eastern-partnership.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
6. Grand C. 2012. Smart Defense. Smart Defense and the Future of NATO. Can the Alliance Meet the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century? Conference report and expert papers. P. 45–49. URL: https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/Conference_Report.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
7. Keukeleire S., MacNaughtan J. 2008. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan. 320 p.
8. Mahncke D. Post-modern Diplomacy: Can EU Foreign Policy Make a Difference in World Politics? EU Diplomacy Papers 4/2011. College of Europe. Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies. 29 p. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type =pdf&doi=69a04a155bdae736262c92b0d2cc1f145914e48b (accessed 12.12.2024).
9. Mattis J.N., Hoffman F. 2005. Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Proceedings Magazine. November. 132(11(1)). URL: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2005/november/ future-warfare-rise-hybrid-wars (accessed 12.12.2024)
10. Meister S., May M.-L. 2009. The EU’s Eastern Partnership – a Misunderstood Offer of Cooperation. DGAP Standpunkt. №7. P. 3. ISSN 1864-3477. URL: https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/2009-07_Stp_May-Meister_engl_www.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024)
11. Nye Josef S. 2004. Soft Power. The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: PublicAffairs. 191 p.
12. Pacquement F. 2013. Statistics on Fifty Years of European Development Aid. France, Europe and Development Aid. From the Treaties of Rome to the Present Day. Bossuat G., Cummings, Gordon D. IGPDE. P. 7–12. URL: https://books.openedition.org/igpde/2937#bodyftn3 (accessed 12.12.2024).
13. Tocci N. 2008. When and Why Does the EU act as a Normative Power in its Neighbourhood? What Prospects for Normative Foreign Policy in a Multipolar World? Working Paper No. 29. The European Security Forum, July 2008. 32 p. URL: https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/1682.pdf (accessed 12.12.2024).
14. Afrika: neoplachennyi dolg kolonizatorov [Africa: The Unpaid Debt of the Colonialists]. 2023. IAfr RAN. 122 p. (In Russian)
15. Borko Iu.A. 2018. Vostochnoe partnerstvo: proekt, real'nost', budushchee [Eastern Partnership: Project, Reality, Future]. Moscow: In-t Evropy RAN. 70 p. (In Russian)
16. Braterskii M.V. 2010. Ėkonomicheskie instrumenty vneshnei politiki i ėkonomicheskie riski [Economic Instruments of Foreign Policy and Economic Risks]. Moscow: GU-VShĖ. 232 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-0699-8. (In Russian)
17. Gerasimov V. 2013.Tsennostʹ nauki v predvidenii [The Value of Science is in Foresight]. Voenno-promyshlennyi kurʹer. 8(476). (In Russian)
18. Khrustalev M.A. 1984. Osnovy teorii vneshneĭ politiki gosudarstva [Fundamentals of the Theory of Foreign Policy of the State]. Un-t druzhby narodov im. Patrisa Lumumby. Moscow. 80 p. (In Russian)
19. Romanova T.A, Pavlova E.B. 2019. Stressoustoĭchivostʹ v Evrosoiuze i Rossiia: sutʹ i perspektivy novoi kontseptsii [Stress Tolerance in the European Union and Russia: the Essence and Prospects of the New Concept]. Mirovaia ėkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia. 63(6). P. 102–109. (In Russian)
20. Romanova T.A. 2011.Evrosoiuz kak normativnaia sila i problemy ee vospriiatiia v Rossii kak barʹer na puti politiko-pravovogo sblizheniia [The European Union as a Regulatory Force and the Problems of its Perception in Russia as a Barrier to Political and Legal Rapprochement]. Vestnik SPbGU, Ser. 6. Vyp. 1. P. 52–66. (In Russian)
21. Romanova T.A. 2017. Kategoriia «stressoustoĭchivostʹ» v Evropeiskom soiuze [Stress Tolerance Category in the European Union]. Sovremennaia Evropa. №4. P. 17–28. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Shishkina O.V. EU Foreign Policy Instruments in the Eastern Partnership Countries: From Development Aid to Military Assistance. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2024;17(6):205-229. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2024-6-99-205-229