Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

The EU Methodology of Security and Defense Planning

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-5-44-142-153

Abstract

Abstract: The article examines the methodology used within the European Union when planning the security and defence policy. The author analyses the key EU documents in this field, the structure of the respective EU bodies and the corresponding decision-making process. In particular, the article looks at the security and defence planning responsibilities of the European Council, the Military Committee and the Military Staff as well as the European Defence Agency. The author conducts a comparative analysis of the EU security and defence planning methodology with that of the US and NATO. He shows that the methodology is very similar. This concerns in particular the structural composition and the logics of the planning, its geographical scope and considerable propaganda component of respective public documents. Similarly to the US and NATO, the EU defence planning relies very little on the strategic forecasting. Instead the EU makes the principle of “strategic uncertainty” the corner stone of its policies. At the same time the EU widely uses elements of “dynamic forecasting” in its planning process, especially for short term forecasting periods. Moreover, the EU moved even further than the US and NATO along this road by applying the techniques that can be described as “dynamic planning”. At the same time the methodology of the EU security and defence planning has some significant specific features. This is explained by the fact, that the EU is mostly a civilian entity and military issues play only a small, though an important role in its work. Thus priority in its planning is given to civilian methods of promoting security, and the use of military force is regarded as the last resort. That is why the main accent in the EU security and defence policy is made on such instruments as crises management, political stabilization, peacekeeping operations and engagement of other states in all sorts of security and defence partnerships. This article is prepared in the framework of the Russian Scientific Fund project 14-18-02973 “Long term forecasting of the development of international relations”.

About the Author

M. V. Alexandrov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation


References

1. Безопасная Европа в мире, который должен стать лучше. Европейская стратегия безопасности. Брюссель, 2003.

2. Обеспечение безопасности в изменяющемся мире. Отчет о внедрении Европейской стратегии безопасности. Документ S407/08, 2008.

3. Annual report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament. Council Of The European Union. 12094/14. Brussels, 23 July 2014 (OR. en).

4. Capability Development Plan. Fact Sheet. European Defense Agency. 7 May 2015.

5. Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.

6. Council Decision of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (2001/79/CFSP). Official Journal of the European Communities, L 27/4 EN, 30.1.2001.

7. Council Joint Action 2004/551/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on the Establishment of the European Defence Agency. Official Journal of the European Union. EN. 17.7.2004. L 245/17-28.

8. Council of the European Union. Council conclusions on Military Capability Development. 3055th Foreign Affairs (Defence) Council meeting. Brussels, 9 December 2010.

9. Future capabilities. Emerging Trends and Key Priorities. European Defense Agency. Brussels, 2014.

10. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/csdp/

11. Statement on Improving European Military Capabilities. 13802/01 (Presse 414-G). Excerpt. 2386th Council meeting. General Affairs. Brussels, 19-20 November 2001.


Review

For citations:


Alexandrov M.V. The EU Methodology of Security and Defense Planning. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015;(5(44)):142-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2015-5-44-142-153

Views: 1075


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)