Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

The Arctic’s Role as an Alternative Trade and Energy System

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2026-3-108-7-30

Abstract

The article examines the strategic role of the Arctic in ensuring global energy and transport security. The Arctic is of growing importance for the global economy and the energy sector, as it contains substantial oil and gas reserves and provides access to the Northern Sea Route (NSR), a shorter transport corridor between Europe and Asia. The route along Russia’s Arctic coast reduces the distance between European and Asian ports by 30–40% compared with the traditional route through the Suez Canal. Against the backdrop of geopolitical instability, the importance of such an alternative corridor is increasing.

The paper focuses on three key aspects: the competitive advantages of the Northern Sea Route over southern maritime routes; the scale of natural-resource reserves in the Arctic region; and the military and strategic significance of the Arctic in the current geopolitical environment.

The analysis shows that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in 2026, which clearly demonstrated the vulnerability of traditional trade routes, underscored the relevance of Russia’s longterm strategy for developing its Arctic vector. This strategy includes both the expansion of the resource base and production capacity, including through projects such as Vostok Oil, and the development of national infrastructure, including shipbuilding capacities such as the Zvezda Shipbuilding Complex. Taken together, these measures strengthen the resilience of export flows and reduce dependence on global trade chokepoints.

The findings are relevant for policy adjustments by states seeking to reduce the risks of trade isolation and disruption, which become particularly acute in periods of geopolitical instability.

About the Author

I. I. Sechin
Rosneft Oil Company
Russian Federation

Igor I. Sechin – PhD in Economics, Chief Executive Officer

117997, Moscow, 26/1 Sofiyskaya Naberezhnaya



References

1. Cafruny A.W. 1985. The Political Economy of International Shipping. International Organization. 39(1). P. 79–119.

2. Çetin O. & Büyüksağnak Y.В. 2021. Turkey's Interest in the Arctic Region: the Evaluation of Being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics. 8(3). Р. 350–358. DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.887540.

3. Ilin I. et al. 2020. State of Research in Arctic Maritime Logistics. Jahn C., Kersten W. Ringle C.M. (Ed.). Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL). Vol. 30. P. 383–407. DOI: 10.15480/882.3145

4. Keohane R.O., Nye J.S. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.

5. Kim Y.H., Min S.K., Gillett N.P. et al. 2023. Observationally-Constrained Projections of an Ice-Free Arctic Even under a Low Emission Scenario. Nat Commun. 14(3139). DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-38511-8

6. Krasner S.D. 1976. State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics. 28(3). P. 317–347.

7. Melia N., Haines K., Hawkins E. 2016. Sea Ice Decline and 21st Century Trans-Arctic Shipping Routes. Geophysical Research Letters. 43(18). Р. 9720–9728. DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069315 Strange S. 1988. States and Markets. London: Pinter.

8. Transportation Research Board and National Research Council. 2007. Polar Icebreakers in a Changing World: An Assessment of U.S. Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11753.

9. Verschuur J., Lumma J., Hall J.W. 2025. Systemic Impacts of Disruptions at Maritime Chokepoints. Nat Commun. 16(1):10421. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-65403-w

10. Verschuur J., Lumma J., Hall J.W. 2025. Systemic Impacts of Disruptions at Maritime Chokepoints. Nature Communications. Vol. 16. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-65403-w

11. Wang M., Overland J. 2012. A Sea Ice Free Summer Arctic within 30 Years: An Update from CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters. №39. 18501. DOI: 10.1029/2012GL052868.

12. Borodkin V.S., & Grikhno M.A. 2021. Ekonomicheskoe preimushchestvo ispol'zovaniya SMP kak glavnogo transarkticheskogo marshruta sbyta SPG v strany ATR i ES [Economic Advantage of Using the NSR as the Main Transarctic Route for LNG Supply to Asia-Pacific and EU countries]. International Research Journal. 6–5(108). P. 7–12. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.108.6.137 (In Russian)

13. Grigoriev M.N. 2022. Gruzopotok i sudopotok v akvatorii Severnogo morskogo puti v 2022 g. [Cargo Flow and Vessel Traffic in the Water Area of the Northern Sea Route in 2022]. Arctic Herald. 1(33). (In Russian)

14. Zefirov V.I., Timoshilova P.S. 2023. Morskaya logistika Severnogo morskogo puti [Maritime Logistics of the Northern Sea Route]. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2(55). P. 91–94. (In Russian)

15. Orlova O.L., Zakharov A.N. 2022. Preimushchestva postavki nefti posredstvom Severnogo morskogo puti pered Sueckim kanalom [Advantages of Oil Supply via the Northern Sea Route over the Suez Canal]. Bulletin of the University of World Civilizations. 4(37). P. 94–100. (In Russian)

16. Pristavka M.V., Ganich Ya.V., Rogaleva N.L., Makarov D.V. 2026. Severnyj morskoj put': ot proshlogo k budushchemu [The Northern Sea Route: From Past to Future]. Moscow: Rusains. 164 p. (In Russian)

17. Sechin I.I. 2023. Znachimost' proekta «Vostok Ojl» dlya rossijskoj ekonomiki i budushchego mirovyh energeticheskih rynkov [The Significance of the Vostok Oil Project for the Russian Economy and the Future of Global Energy Markets]. Problems of Economics and Management of the

18. Oil and Gas Complex. 12(228). Р. 9–21. DOI: 10.33285/1999-6942-2023-12(228)-9-21 (In Russian) Sechin I.I. 2024. Sudostroitel'nyj kompleks «Zvezda»: global'nyj kontekst i narodnohozyajstvennye rezul'taty proekta [Zvezda Shipyard Project: Global Implications and Its Influence on the Russian Economy]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 17(2). P. 7–30. DOI: 10.24833/20718160-2024-2-95-7-30 (In Russian)

19. Soloviev D., Nefedova L. 2025. Severnyj morskoj put': ekonomicheskij potencial, klimaticheskaya ustojchivost' i geopoliticheskoe partnerstvo Rossii i Kitaya [The Northern Sea Route: Economic Potential, Climate Sustainability and Geopolitical Partnership between Russia and China]. Energy Policy. 8(211). DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516_2025_08211_10 (In Russian)

20. Ying C., Wu Y, Zhang W., Jigeer S., Zhang J., Yu H. 2025. Kitajsko-rossijskoe sotrudnichestvo v razvitii Severnogo morskogo puti [Sino-Russian Cooperation in the Development of the Northern Sea Route]. International Organisations Research Journal: Education, Science, New Economy. 20(1). P. 46–74. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Sechin I.I. The Arctic’s Role as an Alternative Trade and Energy System. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2026;19(3):7-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2026-3-108-7-30

Views: 76

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)