Constructing the Soviet Nuclear Threat in Western Political Cartoons, 1945–1953

This article examines the construction of the Soviet nuclear threat in Western political cartoons during the early Cold War, from the end of the Second World War to the first Soviet hydrogen bomb test (1945–1953). Although the mass culture of the atomic age has attracted considerable scholarly attention, the visual representation of atomic themes in political cartooning remains insufficiently studied, especially in Russian-language historiography. The article addresses this gap by showing how cartoons not only reflected, but also actively shaped nuclear discourse, politicized scientific achievement, and contributed to public perceptions of atomic energy, nuclear weapons, and international confrontation.

The study combines historical imagology, a constructivist approach, and content analysis. Its empirical basis consists of 418 Sunday issues of The New York Times, which regularly published political cartoons by artists from the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. The analysis identified 209 atomic-themed cartoons produced by 76 artists and drawn from 66 publications. On this basis, an iconographic codebook of recurrent visual motifs and meanings was compiled.

The results show that Western cartoonists increasingly framed the atomic question through the categories of “problem,” “threat,” and “confrontation with the USSR.” The most frequent motifs were “problem” (115 visual occurrences), “atomic bomb” (99), “threat” (87), “USSR” (77), “United States” (73), and “confrontation with the USSR” (59). The frequency and symbolic density of atomic cartoons peaked at key moments in the emerging nuclear arms race: 1945–1946, 1949, 1950, and 1953. The visual language of Western satirical graphics was dominated by a militarized and masculinized image of atomic power, above all the bomb. Early hopes for peaceful atomic progress were gradually displaced by representations of existential nuclear danger and by the logic of superpower rivalry.

A central finding of the article is that Western political cartoons transformed nuclear weapons from a universal post-war problem into a politically differentiated symbol. By the late 1940s and early 1950s, atomic and hydrogen bombs acquired a national identity: Western nuclear weapons were increasingly represented as defensive and order-preserving, whereas Soviet nuclear weapons were depicted as aggressive, illegitimate, and destabilizing. This dichotomy between “good” Western and “bad” Soviet nuclear power contributed to the visual construction of the USSR as the principal source of nuclear danger. By 1953, the dominant meaning of atomic cartoons had shifted toward nuclear confrontation between the superpowers and, more broadly, antagonism between the Western and Soviet systems. The article concludes that Western political cartoons helped consolidate durable stereotypes of the Soviet nuclear threat, many of which continued to shape the symbolic vocabulary of international relations beyond the early Cold War.

1. Abraham L. 2009. Effectiveness of Cartoons as a Uniquely Visual Medium for Orienting Social Issues. Journalism and Communication Monographs. 11(2). P. 117–165. DOI: 10.1177/152263790901100202

2. Anderson J.E. 2021. Homemaking for the Apocalypse: Domesticating Horror in the Atomic Age. New York: Routledge. 208 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203729977

3. Berger M. 1951. The Story of The New York Times, 1851–1951. New York: Simon and Schuster. 589 p.

4. Boyer P. 1994. By the Bomb’s Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 464 р.

5. Catledge T. 1971. My Life and The Times. New York: Harper & Row. 319 р.

6. Chen K. W, Phiddian R., Stewart R. 2017. Towards a Discipline of Political Cartoon Studies: Mapping the Field. Satire and Politics. Palgrave Studies in Comedy. Ed. by J.M. Davis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 125–162. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56774-7_5

7. Heed T., Kubyshkin A.I. 2019. Armageddon: Comparative Images of the Nuclear Conflict Between the United States and the Soviet Union in American Cinema. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 24(5). P. 250–258. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2019.5.18

8. Josephson P.R. 2022. Nuclear Russia. The Atom in Russian Politics and Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 140 р.

9. Kuipers G. 2011. The Politics of Humour in the Public Sphere: Cartoons, Power and Modernity in the First Transnational Humour Scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 14(1). Р. 63–80. DOI: 10.1177/1367549410370072

10. Leerssen J., Beller M. (eds.) 2007. Imagology. The Cultural Construction and Literary Representation of National Characters. A Critical Survey. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. 476 р.

11. Rifas L. 2007. Cartooning and Nuclear Power: From Industry Advertising to Activist Uprising and Beyond. Political Science & Politics. 40(2). Р. 255–260. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096507070394

12. Szasz F.M., Takechi I. 2007. Atomic Heroes and Atomic Monsters: American and Japanese Cartoonists Confront the Onset of the Nuclear Age, 1945–1980. The Historian. 69(4). Р. 728–752. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6563.2007.00196.x

13. Van Lente D. (ed.) 2012. The Nuclear Age in Popular Media. A Transnational History, 1945– 1965. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 280 p.

14. Weart S.R. 2012. The Rise of Nuclear Fear. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. 367 р.

15. Webb B. 2018. Laughter Louder Than Bombs? Apocalyptic Graphic Satire in Cold War Cartooning, 1946–1959. American Quarterly. 70(2). P. 235–266. DOI: 10.1353/AQ.2018.0016

16. Zeman S.C., Amundson M.A. (eds.) 2004. Atomic Culture: How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Boulder: University Press of Colorado. 199 р.

17. Budaev E.V., Chudinov A.P. 2006. Metafora v politicheskom interdiskurse [Metaphor in Political Interdiscourse]. Yekaterinburg: UrGPU. 208 p. (In Russian)

18. Golubev A.V. 2018. «Podlinnyi lik zagranitsy»: obraz vneshnego mira v sovetskoi politicheskoi karikature, 1922–1941 [“The True Face of Abroad”: The Image of the External World in Soviet Political Caricature, 1922–1941]. Moscow: IRI RAN. 282 p. (In Russian)

19. Kotelenets E.A., Zatulovskaya M.S. 2019. Podmena ponyatii «Rossiya» i «SSSR» v gazete «The New York Times» (1946–1991) [Substitution of the Concepts “Russia” and “USSR” in the Newspaper The New York Times (1946–1991)]. Nauchnyi dialog. №4. P. 154–166. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-4-154-166 (In Russian)

20. Krasavchenko T.N. 2017. Zolushka komparativistiki – imagologiya: o statuse, teorii i istorii [Cinderella of Comparative Studies – Imagology: On Status, Theory and History]. In: Tsurganova, E.A. (ed.). Sovremennaya nauka o literature: osnovnye tendentsii i problemy [Modern Literary Studies: Main Trends and Problems]. Moscow: INION RAN. P. 46–73. (In Russian)

21. Melnikova N.V. 2016. Formirovanie obraza «atomnogo» SSSR na Zapade v 1945–1950 gg. [Shaping by the WEST of the Nuclear Soviet Union’s Image from 1945 to 1950]. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal. №12. P. 38–44. (In Russian)

22. Melnikova N.V. 2018. Istoriya vzaimodeistviya yadernoi energii i obshchestva v Rossii [The History of Interaction between Nuclear Energy and Society in Russia] / Melnikova N.V., Artemov E.T., Bedel A.E., Voloshin N.P., Mikheev M.V. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta. 127 p. (In Russian)

23. Nevzorov M.V. 2024. Obrazy «razrushitel'noi sily» yadernogo oruzhiya v kontekste rezhima yadernoi bezopasnosti mezhdu SSSR i SShA [Images of the “Destructive Power” of Nuclear Weapons in the Context of the Nuclear Security Regime between the USSR and the USA]. In: Ryabov O.V. (ed.). Imagologiya Kholodnoi voiny: «svoi» i «chuzhie» v massovoi kul'ture SSSR i SShA [Imagology of the Cold War: “Us” and “Them” in the Mass Culture of the USSR and the USA]. Saint Petersburg: RGPU. P. 208–215. (In Russian)

24. Prosolova E.V. 2024. Yadernaya ugroza i obraz amerikanskogo vraga v sovetskikh plakatakh kholodnoi voiny [Nuclear Threat and the Image of the American Enemy in Soviet Cold War Posters]. Telekinet. №3. P. 6–18. DOI: 10.24412/2618-9313-2024-328-6-18 (In Russian)

25. Repina L.P. 2020. Istoricheskaya imagologiya i problemy mezhkul'turnogo dialoga [Historical Imagology and Problems of Intercultural Dialogue]. In: Labutina T.L. (ed.). «Svoi» / «Chuzhoi» v kross-kul'turnykh kommunikatsiyakh stran Zapada i Rossii [“Us” / “Them” in Cross-Cultural Communications of Western Countries and Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya. P. 17–46. (In Russian)

26. Rukavishnikov V.O. 2005. Kholodnaya voina. Kholodnyi mir [Cold War. Cold Peace]. Moscow: Akad. Proekt. 862 p. (In Russian)

27. Ruzhentseva, N.B., Shustrova, E.V., Voroshilova, M.B. 2015. Yumor i ironiya v politicheskom diskurse [Humor and Irony in Political Discourse]. Yekaterinburg: UrGPU. 253 p. (In Russian)

28. Ryabov O.V. (ed.). 2024. Imagologiya Kholodnoi voiny: «svoi» i «chuzhie» v massovoi kul'ture SSSR i SShA [Imagology of the Cold War: “Us” and “Them” in the Mass Culture of the USSR and the USA]. Saint Petersburg: RGPU. (In Russian)

29. Savitskaya, A.S. 2009. Sredstva massovoi informatsii v situatsii konfliktnogo vzaimodeistviya [Mass Media in a Situation of Conflict Interaction]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. №92. P. 84–88. (In Russian)

30. Senyavsky, A.S., Senyavskaya, A.S. 2006. Istoricheskaya imagologiya i problema formirovaniya «obraza vraga» (na materialakh Rossiiskoi istorii XX v.) [Historical Imagology and the Problem of Forming the "Image of the Enemy" (Based on Materials of Russian History of the 20th Century)]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Istoriya Rossii». 2(6). P. 54–78. (In Russian)

31. Tarbeev I.M. 2025. Rol' yadernoi ugrozy v konstruirovanii obraza SShA na sovetskom tele ekrane v pervoi polovine 1980-kh gg. [The Role of the Nuclear Threat in Constructing the Image of the United States on the Soviet Television Screen in the First Half of the 1980s]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya». №6. P. 52–67. DOI: 10.28995/20736339-2025-6-52-67 (In Russian)

32. Voroshilova M.B. 2013. Politicheskii kreolizovannyi tekst: kliuchi k prochteniiu [Political Creolized Text: Keys to Interpretation]. Yekaterinburg: UrGPU. 194 p. (In Russian)

33. Zhuravleva V.I. 2011. Izuchenie drug druga v kontekste imagologii rossiisko-amerikanskikh otnoshenii [Studying Each Other in the Context of the Imagology of Russian-American Relations]. In: V.V. Sogrin (ed.). Amerikanskii ezhegodnik 2011. Moscow: Ves' Mir. P. 199–208. (In Russian)

34. Zhuravleva V.I. 2023. Karibskii krizis i yadernaya ugroza v karikaturistike SShA i SSSR:

35. dve versii odnoi istorii [The Cuban Missile Crisis and the Nuclear Threat in Soviet and American Cartoons: One Story in Two Representations]. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik. №2. P. 77–100. DOI: 10.54770/20729286 2023 2 76 (In Russian)

36. Zhuravleva V.I. 2024. Sovetskaya i amerikanskaya karikaturistika v epokhu Kholodnoi voiny kak ob’ekt izucheniya: teoretiko-metodologicheskii diskurs [American and Soviet Political Cartoons in the Cold War: Theoretical and Methodological Discourse]. Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatel'nyi zhurnal «Istoriya». 15(11(145)). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840033216-6 (In Russian)

37. Zhuravleva V.I. 2025. Reprezentatsii yadernoi ugrozy v sovetskoi i amerikanskoi karikaturistike vremen Kholodnoi voiny: skhodstva i razlichiya [The Nuclear Threat in Representations of Soviet and American Cartoonists During the Cold War: Similarities and Differences]. Elektronnyi nauchno-obrazovatel'nyi zhurnal «Istoriya». 16(12(158)). Part I. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840037615-5(In Russian)