Foreign Policy Niche of Small States: The Problem of Choice (The Case of Baltic States)

The paper deals with the range of problems regarding the relation between decisions of political elite in small states and their striving for occupying a certain niche in external (foreign) political environment. The typology of such niches is proposed. The article deals with economic, military, political, and ideological dimensions of political elites' decisions in the Baltic states. The article makes the case of the following hypothesis: the exploitation of the "Russian threat" concept by political elites of the Baltic states is aimed at occupying a special niche within the Euro-Atlantic community. The narrow corridor for political maneuver imposed by strategic imperatives of NATO induces political elites of the Baltic states to attract attention of powerful states, which brings resources, finances and more prominent status. Inciting confrontation with Russia serves as a means for internal political consolidation, proving loyalty towards NATO, and contributes to individual careers of politicians with the EU institutions. The choice of 'conflict model' entails side-effects: slowdown of social and economic development in the long run. The following research inference is made: by means of conflict model which is being realized within external political niche ("gate-keeper" and "missionary" types) political elite of the Baltic states gain additional resources in the middle-term perspective. However, in the long term this political course generally reduces opportunities for political and economic development of small states. In theoretical and methodological dimension the research results confirm productivity of three-level analysis approach towards activity of political elite. The most general level of analysis deals with empire units of international relations which structure the environment for small states' elites actions. At the middle level it is possible scrutinize different varieties of external (foreign) political niches available to a certain small state. The third level of analysis deals with investigation of concrete economic, military, political and ideological decisions of political elite within a certain external (foreign) political niche.

political elite, Baltic states, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, NATO, infrastructure, foreign policy niche

1. Богатуров А.Д. Современный мир: система или конгломерат? Опыт транссистемного подхода // Очерки теории и политического анализа международных отношений. М.: НОФМО, 2002. C.129-144.

2. Григорьев Л. Страны Балтии: в поисках выхода из кризиса // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 4. С. 121-138.

3. Концепция внешней политики Российской Федерации // Дипломатический вестник. 1993. № 1-2. С. 3-23.

4. Концепция внешней политики Российской Федерации от 12 февраля 2013 г. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/2/25.html (Дата обращения: 03.02.2015).

5. Лавров С.В. Россия и мир в XXI веке // Россия в глобальной политике. 2008. № 4 [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: www.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_11159 (Дата обращения: 03.06.2015).

6. Межевич Н.М. Внешняя политика государств Прибалтики и крупные инфраструктурные проекты 2010-2014 годов // Балтийский регион. 2014. № 1(19). С. 7-28.

7. Отношения России и стран Прибалтики: от упущенных возможностей к реальным перспективам. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, 2013. С.6.

8. Примаков Е.М. Вызовы и альтернативы многополярного мира: роль России. М.: Изд-во Московского университета, 2014.

9. Современные международные отношения / Под ред. А.В. Торкунова, А.В. Мальгина. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2012.

10. Соколов В. Почему Таллин стремится на запад // Независимая газета. 2001. 21 июня.

11. Breuning M. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

12. Colomer J. Great Empires, Small Nations. The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State. Routledge, 2007.

13. Cooper R. The Breaking of Nations. Order and Chaos in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2003. P.39

14. Grigas A., Kasekamp A., Maslauskaite K., Zorgenfreija L. The Baltic states in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow // Studies & Reports. No 98, Notre Europe - Jacques Delors Institute, 2013.

15. Honore A. EU requirement to ensure alternative gas supply from 3rd December 2014. Oxford Institute of Energy Studies, 2014.

16. Keohane R. Lilliputians' Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics // International Organization. 1969. Vol. 23. P. 291-310.

17. Krugman P. Baltic Brouhaha // New York Times. 2013. May 1.

18. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World? Small States in International Relations / Ed. by Neumann I., Gstöhl S. University of Iceland, 2004.

19. Military Spending In Europe // Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2015.

20. Moravcsik A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics // International Organization. 1997. Vol. 51, No.4. P. 513-553.

21. Planned Agenda of Rail Baltica // Rail Baltic Official Web-Site [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: railbaltica.info/information/ (Дата обращения: 03.06.2015).

22. Remarks by Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, Brookings Institution // U.S. Department of State [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://translations.state.gov/st/english/texttrans/2015/01/20150127313219.html#ixzz3QfXccKYj (Дата обращения: 03.02.2015).

23. Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature // Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2006. Vol.19. P. 669-684.

24. Small States in International Relations Small States in International Relations / Ed. by Ingebritsen K., Neumann I., Gstöhl S. University of Scandinavia Press, 2006.

25. Thorhallsson B., Wivel A. Small States in the European Union: What Do We Know and What Would We Like to Know? // Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2006. Vol.19. P. 651-668.