THE U.S. QUEST FOR NEW TECHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MILITARY SUPERIORITY: DILEMMAS OF THE THIRD OFFSET STRATEGY

The last decades have witnessed a remarkable surge of interest in studying the influence of science and technology on world politics. However, not all channels of such influence have been examined with equal rigor. Whereas numerous researchers have explored meticulously the impact of technologies on warfare, the issues of using military-technological breakthroughs to achieve political goals have been addressed less frequently. This paper seeks to fill this gaping niche by decomposing the Third Offset Strategy (TOS), a recent initiative of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) aimed at ensuring military-technological superiority of the United States in the XXI century, predominantly, by offsetting the new capabilities of the Russian Federation and the Popular Republic of China. The first section unveils a conceptual framing of the TOS, the second section examines a variety of technological priorities, and the final section identifies key uncertainties around implementation of this initiative in the mid-term and long-term perspective. The conclusion postulates that the emergence of the TOS was determined by both an erosion of the U.S. military superiority and budget constraints, and, therefore, its content might change if budget austerity imperatives will stop dominating the DoD strategists' thinking. The launch of the third offset strategy has also important international-political aspects. First, the TOS fits in the context of the U.S. rebalance to the Asia-Pacific. Second, the American allies in Europe might face a threat of a widening technological gap with the United States and a need to boost their spending on defense research and development, which might be unfeasible in the current fiscal environment. Third, the concentration of the United States on countering high-end opponents might lead to a further marginalization of the Middle East. Fourth, the TOS is likely to contain a disinformation component and aim at dragging the peer competitors of the U.S. into an exhaustive arms race.

United States, defense, national security, technology, Third Offset Strategy, deterrence,  innovation, revolution in military affairs, artificial intellect, human-machine teaming, electronic warfare

1. Balyshev A.V., Konnov V.I. Formirovanie nauchnoi sostavliaiushchei oboronnogo zakaza SShA [Forming The Research Component of The U.S. Defense Budget]. Vestnik MGIMO-University, 2015, no.6, pp. 155-164. (In Russian).

2. Batiuk V.I. Voennaya politika SShA v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione pri administratsii B. Obamy [The U.S. Defense Policy in the Asia-Pacific under the Obama Administration]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika [Moscow University Journal of World Politics], 2012, no.3, pp. 29-48. (In Russian).

3. Burenok V.M., Gladyshevskii V.L. Informatika i vychislitel'naya tekhnika: perspektivy razvitiya i primeneniya v voennom dele [Informatics and Computing: Prospects and Defense Applications]. Vooruzhenie i ekonomika – Armaments and Economy, 2015, no.3, pp.17–32. (In Russian).

4. Burenok V.M. Tekhnicheskie i tekhnologicheskie osnovy razvitiya vooruzheniya i voennoi tekhniki [Technical and Technological Foundations of Development Military Capablities]. Moscow, Granitsa Publ., 2010. 210 p. (In Russian).

5. Belokon' S.P. Tekhnologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh vooruzhennykh konfliktov i voennaya bezopasnost' Rossii [Technological Aspects of Modern Conflicts and Military Security of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 2015, vol. 7, no. 4., pp. 23-44. (In Russian).

6. Veselov V.A. Transformatsiya parametrov strategicheskoi stabil'nosti: rol' tekhnologicheskogo faktora. [The Role of Technological Factor in Transforming Parameters of Strategic Stability]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 2015, vol.7, no.3, pp. 23-56. (In Russian).

7. Golubev D. Nauka i innovatsii v teoriiakh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Science And Innovations In International Relations Theories]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy - International Trends, 2015, vol. 13, no.2, pp. 66-80. (In Russian)

8. Klochikhin E.A. Nauchnaya i innovatsionnaya politika Kitaya [China’s Science and Innovation Policy]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy - International Trends, 2013, vol.11, no.33, pp. 37-55. (In Russian)

9. Kokoshin A. A. Blitzkrieg i struktura revoliutsii v voennom dele [Blitzkrieg and the Structure of the Revolution in Military Affairs]. Klio, 2015, no. 12, pp. 96–109. (In Russian)

10. Kokoshin A. A., Bartenev V. I., Veselov V. A. Podgotovka revoliutsii v voennom dele v usloviiakh biudzhetnykh ogranichenii: novye initsiativy Ministerstva oborony SShA [Launching a Revolution in Military Affairs in the Age of Austerity: New Initiatives of the U.S. DoD]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura, 2015, no.11, pp. 3–22. (In Russian)

11. Kokoshin A.A., Baluevskii Iu.N., Potapov V.Ia. Vliianie noveishikh tendentsii v razvitii tekhnologii i sredstv vooruzhennoi bor'by na voennoe iskusstvo [Nuclear Factor and the Russian Military Thought]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 2015, vol.7, no.4, pp. 3-22. (In Russian)

12. Korsakov G.B. O voennykh innovatsiiakh i strategicheskikh kontseptsiiakh v SShA [On Military Innovations and Strategic Concepts]. SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura, 2013, no.1, pp. 71-88. (In Russian)

13. Krepinevich E. Strategiya v epokhu zhestkoi ekonomii [Strategy in an era of austerity]. Rossiia v global'noi politike - Russia in Global Affairs, 2013, no. 2, pp. 60-71. (In Russian)

14. Krutskikh A.V., Zinov'eva E.S. Informatizatsiia i makrotekhnologii: novoe litso mirovoi politiki [Informatisation and New Technologies: A New Look Of World Politics]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy - International Trends, 2014, vol.12., no.36-37, pp. 20-32. (In Russian)

15. Pankova L.V. Strategicheskaia stabil'nost' i novaia amerikanskaia «strategiia kompensatsii» [Strategic Stability and the U.S. Third Offset Strategy]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia i mirovaia politika, 2015, vol.7, no.3, pp. 115-141. (In Russian)

16. Brimley S., Fitzgerald B., Sayler K. Game Changers. Disruptive Technology and U.S. Defense Strategy. Center for a New American Security. September 2013. Available at: http://www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/CNAS_Gamechangers_BrimleyFitzGeraldSayler_0.pdf (Accessed: 20.05.2016)

17. Cohen E.A. Change and Transformation in Military Affairs. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2004, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 395–407.

18. Colby E. Nuclear Weapons in the Third Offset Strategy: Avoiding a Nuclear Blind Spot in the Pentagon’s New Initiative. Center for a New American Security, February 2015. Available at: http://www.cnas.org/sites/default/files/publications-pdf/Nuclear%20Weapons%20in%20the%203rd%20Offset%20Strategy.pdf (Accessed: 20.05.2016)

19. Dombrowski P. Policy Report America’s Third Offset Strategy New Military Technologies and Implications for the Asia Pacific. Policy Report, June 2015. RSIS. Available at: http://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PR150608_Americas-Third-Offset-Strategy.pdf (Accessed: 20.05.2016)

20. Eaglen M. 2017 defense budget: Obama bets on technological breakthroughs instead of tackling the challenges of today. American Enterprise Institute. February 9, 2016. Available at: http://www.aei.org/publication/2017-defense-budget-obama-bets-on-technological-breakthroughs-instead-of-tackling-thechallenges-of-today/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

21. Eaglen M. Mark as favorite What is the Third Offset Strategy? American Enterprise Institute. 16 February 2016. Available at: http://www.aei.org/publication/what-is-the-third-offset-strategy/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

22. Fay M. Does the Offset Strategy Risk ‘Transformation”? Niskanen Center. April 20, 2016. Available at: https://niskanencenter.org/blog/does-the-offset-strategy-risk-transformation/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

23. Fiott D. A Revolution Too Far? US Defence Innovation, Europe and NATO’s Military-Technological Gap. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2016.1176565

24. Freedman L. Deterrence. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004. 145 p.

25. Gholz E. The RMA and the Defense Industry. US Military Innovation since the Cold War: Creation without Destruction. Creation without Destruction. Ed. by Harvey M. Sapolsky, Benjamin H. Friedman, and Brendan Green. London: Routledge, 2009, pp. 172-181.

26. Goure D. Directed Energy Weapons: The Key to Securing America’s Dominance over Russia and China. The National Interest, 20 April 2016. Available at: http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/directed-energyweapons-the-key-securing-americas-dominance-15863 (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

27. H.R.1735 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016. 114th Congress (2015-2016). Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1735/text#toc-H7A7836870B984C1D98358 1AA04F7C911 (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

28. Harrison T. Analysis of the FY 2017 Defense Budget. A Report of the CSIS International Security Program’s Defense Outlook Series. Available at: http://csis.org/files/publication/160420_Analysis_of_the_FY2017_Defense_Budget.pdf (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

29. Krepinevich A.F. Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions. National Interest, 1994, vol. 37, pp. 31-36.

30. Lamothe D. Veil of Secrecy Lifted on Pentagon Office Planning ‘Avatar’ Fighters and Drone Swarms. Washington Post. 8 March 2016. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/03/08/ inside-the-secretive-pentagon-office-planning-skyborg-fighters-and-drone-swarms/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

31. Locks B. Bad Guys Know What Works: Asymmetric Warfare and the Third Offset. War on the Rocks, 23.06.2015. Available to: http://warontherocks.com/2015/06/bad-guys-know-what-works-asymmetricwarfare-and-thethird-offset/2/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

32. Martinage R. Toward a New Offset Strategy: Exploiting U.S. Long-Term Advantages to Restore U.S. Global Power Projection Capability. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014.

33. Maucione S. Unraveling the Mystery of DoD’s Third Offset Strategy. Federal News Radio. February 5, 2016. Available at: http://federalnewsradio.com/defense/2016/02/unraveling-mystery-third-offset-strategy / (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

34. Maucione S. DoD is Setting Up the Third Offset for the Next President. Federal News Radio. May 2, 2016. Available at: http://federalnewsradio.com/defense/2016/05/dod-setting-third-offset-next-president/ (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

35. The Global Politics of Science and Technology. Ed. by Mayer M. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2014. Vol. 1. Concepts from International Relations and Other Disciplines. 282 p. Vol. 2. Perspectives, Cases and Methods. 302 p.

36. Mearsheimer J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, 2001. 555 p.

37. Memorandum for Chairman, Defense Science Board. Subject: Terms of Reference- Defense Science Board 2015 Summer Study on Autonomy. 17.11.2014. Department of Defense. Available at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/tors/TOR-2014-11-17-Summer_Study_2015_on_Autonomy.pdf (Accessed: 15.05.2016).

38. Memorandum for Secretary of the Navy: Navy Program Balance. Naval Institute News. Available at: https://news.usni.org/2015/12/17/document-budget-directive-letter-from-secdef-carter-to-secnav-mabus (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

39. Pomerleau M. Strategy: what man and machine can do together. Defense Systems, 04.05.2016. Available at: https://defensesystems.com/articles/2016/05/04/dod-work-on-third-offset-strategy.aspx (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

40. Reagan Defense Forum: The Third Offset Strategy. As Delivered by Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work. Reagan Presidential Library, Simi Valley, CA, November 7, 2015. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/628246/reagan-defense-forum-the-third-offset-strategy (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

41. Remarks by Defense Deputy Secretary Robert Work at the CNAS Inaugural National Security Forum, 14.12.2016. Available at: http://www.cnas.org/transcripts/work-remarks-national-security-forum#.Vy3pvoR96M8 (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

42. Secretary of Defense Testimony Submitted Statement -- House Appropriations Committee-Defense (FY 2017 Budget Request). As Submitted by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. US Department of Defense. Washington, D.C., February 25, 2016. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/672855/submitted-statement-house-appropriations-committee-defense-fy-2017-budget-reque (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

43. Shaffer A. The Challenge of Technological Superiority. Defense Acquisition, Logistics and Logistics. Better Buying Power 3.0. Special Issue, pp. 8-10. Available at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/sa/docs/ATandL-issues/DATL_Jul_Aug2015.pdf (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

44. Simóna L. The ‘Third’ US Offset Strategy and Europe’s ‘Anti-access’ Challenge. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2016. DOI:10.1080/01402390.2016.1163260

45. Skolnikoff E. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994. 322 p.

46. Submitted Statement -- Senate Armed Services Committee (Budget Request) As Submitted by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. US Department of Defense. Washington, D.C., March 3, 2015. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/606647/submitted-statement-senate-armed-servicescommittee-budget-request (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

47. U.S. Senate. Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities. Hearing to Receive Testimony on the Strategy and Implementation of the Department of Defense’s Technology Offsets Initiative in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2017 and the Future Years Defense Program. April 12, 2016. US Committee on Armed Services. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.armed-services.senate.gov/hearings/16-04-12-strategy-and-implementation-of-the-department-ofdefenses-technology-offsets-initiative (Accessed: 15.05.2016)

48. Weiss Ch. Science, Technology and International Relations. Technology in Society, 2005, no.27, pp. 295-313.