DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-16-25
Abstract
Khorasanian thinkers believed that, the discovery of their origins and the "Other", is not a single whole act, but rather a procedural, almost stage-by-stage like capacity to understand the world. Evidence suggests that in order to survive (or just grow), one must move from their initial sphere of life/science to the next. Such mobility was influenced heavily by the tradition of constant crossing of boundaries and countries, formalizing commercial/scientific flexibility of the entire culture of the region. However, this potential remains untapped in the construction of the new history of nations. Therefore it is fair to ask: what is the reason for the lack of dialogue on decolonization of, both within the region (between researchers of different republics), between the Russian and Central Asian researchers, as well as between other regions, ie South-to-South (the Middle East, Latin America, India, etc.). Without doubt, every one of us has worthy of alibi. But it is important to understand that today's distancing from the topic in Central Asia; is not an ideological camouflage ala Soviet-style, but rather a preservation of the myth of Westphalia on the priority of national sovereignty. Finding one's way out of this maze created by the rhetoric of the nations and the logic of coloniality (as Kuidjano) is a very real issue. The first step may be to recognize that our very own knowledge base is colonial. Accordingly, the process must begin with ridding ourselves from this state, starting the process of de-coloniality. To initiate such an understanding, the author proposes to use - dahlez, philosophical concept, put forward with a view to the perception of many values of plural-cycle culture of the region, as well as the values of the outside.
About the Author
N. T. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva
Oriental Studies Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Philos., Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Central Asian, Caucasian and Uralo-Povoljiyn studies,
107031 Moscow, Rojdestvenka-str. 12
References
1. Abashin S.N. Vostokovedy protiv orientalisma? [Orientalists against Orientalism] («Antropoligical Forum») URL: http://www.nlobooks.ru/node/4912#sthash.XF88ybHI.dpuf (accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
2. Abdullaev R. Russkii narod – ne ot irantsev, a tadzhiki – ne ariitsy [Russian people are not Iranian, and Tajiks are not Arians] URL: http://fundamental-economic.uz/article/русский-народ-не-от-иранцев-а-таджик/ (accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
3. Abu Hamid Al-Gazali. Voskreshenie nauk o vere [Resurrection of Sciences faith]. Selected Chapters.Translation of V.V. Naumkin. Moscow: Sceince, 1980. 369 p. (In Russian).
4. Aini S. Ta"rikhi inkilobi Bukhoro [History of revolution in Bukhara]. Dushanbe: Adib, 1987. 240 p. (In Tajik).
5. Valikhanova N.S. Istoriografiia natsional'nykh dvizhenii partii Srednei Azii v period 1917–1991 gg. [Historiography of national movements in Central Asia in 1917-1991], Phd thesis in history, defended at Moscow state University of service. Мoscow, 2001. 313 p. (In Russian).
6. Hegel G. Entsiklopediia filosofskikh nauk [The Encyclopedia of Philosophy] Vol. 3. The philosophy of Spirit. Moscow: Thought, 1977. 471 p. (In Russian).
7. Gercen A.I. Sobr. soch. v 30 tt. T. 6. S togo berega. Stat'i. Dolg prezhde vsego (1847–1851) [works in 30 vol. Vol. 6. From the other bank, articles. Debt is first of all (1847–1851)]. Moscow: AS Publishing House, 1955. 551 p. (In Russian).
8. Deti Kyrgyzstana igrayut v genocid i vosstanie protiv Rossii [Children of Kyrgyzstan play genocide and the uprising game against Russia] URL: http://www.currenttime.tv/media/video/27646148.html (accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
9. Istoriia i istoriki Uzbekistana v KhKh stoletii. [History and historians of Uzbekistan in XX cent.] Ed. by Alimova D.A. Tashkent: Nauvrouz, 2014. 428 p. (In Russian).
10. Konstitutsiia RF [The Constitution of Russian Federation] URL:http://www.constitution.ru/(accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
11. Kosach G.G. Stanovlenie sovremennykh form politicheskoi zhizni na Vostoke. Istoriia Vostoka [The formation of modern political life in the East], History of East, in 6 vol.; vol. IV. Book 2. East in a New Time (ХVIII – XX). Moscow: Medina, 2005. 433 p. (In Russian).
12. Masov R.: Tadzhiki nikogda ne byli odnim narodom s uzbekami (otvet G. Khidoiatovu) [Tajiks have never been united people with Uzbeks]. Comunicon. 18.08.2011. URL: http://comunicom.ru/2011-08-04-16-28-45/103-tajiki-uzbeki.html (accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
13. Noveishii filosofskii slovar' [The newest dictionary on philosophy] 3rd ed. Moscow: Book’s House. 2003. 1280 p. (In Russian).
14. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva N.T. Tsentral'naia Aziia, evropotsentrizm, kolonial'nost' [Central Asia, Eurocentrism, Coloniality]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015. No.6. Pp. 51-63. (In Russian).
15. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva N.T. Problemy cosmopolitizma i alternativnost v istorii narodov Central Asia [Problems of cosmopolitanism and alternativity in Central Asian history] MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 103-111. (In Russian).
16. Nurulla-Khodzhaeva N.T. Obshchina v Tsentral'noi Azii (dialektika traditsii i modernizatsii v nachale KhKhI veka) [Central Asian community (dialectic of traditions and modernization at the beg. of 21 century)]. Moscow: MGUKI, 2012. 369 p. (In Russian).
17. Proizvedenie I.A. Karimova «Bez istoricheskoi pamiati net budushchego» [The work of Karimov I.E. Without Historical memory there is no future]. Vsemirnaia istoriia. URL: http://vsemirnaya-istoriya.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3:bez-proshlogo-net-budushego-iakarimov&catid=1:drevniymir&Itemid=29 (In Russian).
18. Rumi. Mesto dlia tebia i dlia menia [This place for you and me]. URL: http://pritchi.ru/id_7209 (accessed 18.08.2016 г.). (In Russian).
19. Said E.B. Orientalizm. Zapadnye kontseptsii Vostoka [Orientalism. Western Conception on East]. Moscow: Russkii mir, 2006. 640 p.
20. Sudebnyi otchet Bukharinsko-trotskistskogo protsessa [Judicial report of Bukharin-Trotsky process]. M.: Mezhdunarodnaia sem'ia, 1997. URL: http://www.pereplet.ru/history/Russia/USSR/1936-1941/buh-tro/utro12-5-38-1.html#hodj (accessed 18.08.2016).
21. Torkunov А.V. Po doroge v budushee [On its way to future]. Мoscow: Aspekt press, 2010. 476 p. (In Russian).
22. Fitrat А. Davrai Hukmroniiamir Olimhon [Rule of Amir Alimhon]. Dushanbe: State Publishing House, 1991. 64 p. (In Tajik).
23. Freid Z. Pechal' i melankholiia. URL: http://www.psychoanalyst.ru/banners/duty/freud_01.pdf (accessed 18.08.2016). (In Russian).
24. Khodizoda R. Tarchumai khol va merosi adabi [Biography and his heritage]. Dushanbe, 1976. 130 р. (In Tajik).
25. Shekspir V. Buria [The Tempest]. Full Compendium of Works in 8 Vol. Ed. by A. A. Smirnova. M. -L.: Goslitizdat, 1949. Vol 8. Pp. 311-417. (In Russian)
26. Etkind А. Vnutrenniaia kolonizatsiia. Imperskii opyt Rossii [Internal colonization. Imperial experience of Russia] Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. 448 p.
27. Altmann P. Plurinationality and interculturality in Ecuador: the Indigenous movement and the development of politica; concepts. Iberoamericana. Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. 2013. Vol. XLIII, no. 1–2. Pp. 47–66.
28. Appiah K.A. Cosmopolitan Patriots. Critical Inquiry. Spring 1997. Vol. 23, no. 3. Pp. 617–639.
29. Beyond Neoliberal Governance: The World Social Forum as Subaltern Cosmopolitan Politics and Legality in Boaventura de Sousa Santos and Ce´sar A. Rodriguez-Garavito (eds.) Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. 29-63.
30. Bhabha H. The Location of culture. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 1994. 285 р.
31. Bhabha H. Postcolonial Authority and Postmodern Guilt in Grossberg L., Nelson C., Treichler P.A. (eds.) Cultural Studies. New York & London: Routledge,1992. Pp. 56–68.
32. Boaventura de S. S. Between Prospera and Caliban: Colonialism, Postcolonialism, and Inter-identity. LusoBrazilian Review. 2002. Vol. 39, no. 2. Pp. 9-43.
33. Gilroy P. Postcolonial Melancholia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005. 192 р.
34. Fanon F. The Wretched of the Earth. NBY: Grove Press 1963. 317 p.
35. Hudis P. Marx's Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket, 2013. 272 p.
36. Quidjano A. The paradoxes of modernity. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. 1989. Vol. 3, No. 2. Рр. 147-177.
37. Lucero J.A. Fanon in the Andes: Fausto Reinaga, Indianismo, and the Black Atlantic. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies. 2008. Vol. 1, no. 1. Pp. 13-22.
38. Mignolo W. D. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 416 p.
39. Mignolo W. D. Delinking. Cultural Studies. 2007. Vol. 21, no. 2. Pp. 449-514.
40. Mignolo W. D. The prospect of harmony and the decolonial view of the World. URL: http://waltermignolo.com/ the-prospect-of-harmony-and-the-decolonial-view-of-the-world/ (проверено 18.08.2016 г.).
41. Moore-Gilbert B. Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics. London: Verso, 1997. 243 p.
42. Moosa I. Ghazali and the Poetics of Imagination. The University of North Carolina Press, 2005. 349 p.
43. Roschin E. The Concept of Friendship: From Princes to State. European Journal of International Relations. 2006. Vol.12. Pp. 599-624.
44. Said E. Orientalism. 1978. London: Penduin, 340 p.
45. Spivak G. An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2013. 607 p.
46. Spivak G. Can the Subaltern Speak? Frankfurt: Turia& Kant, 2007. 159 p.
47. Scheinman T. A tweeter post. URL: https://onsizzle.com/i/ted-scheinman-follow-ted-scheinman-and-in-theend-britain-1025159 (проверено 18.08.2016 г.).
48. Thiong'o N. Moving the Centre: The Struggle for Cultural Freedoms. James Currey, 2008. 208 p.
Review
For citations:
Nurulla-Khodzhaeva N.T. DECOLONIALITY OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTERCULTURAL “DAHLEZ”. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(4(49)):16-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-4-49-16-25
Views:
1148
Email this article 