PROBLEM OF DEMOCRACY PROMOTION IN CONTEXT OF POSTCOLONIAL FEMINISM

The article deals with the problems of democratization as a neocolonial practice. The author argues that the spread of democracy is similar in many respects to colonialism and civilizing mission as universal and even messianic phenomena. He notes that both of these phenomena, despite the similarity of their origin, have different "gender basis" (colonialism has characteristics of masculinity and civilizing mission - of femininity). The author reviewed the history of transforming the concepts of "colonialism" and "civilizing mission". Results parallels between the two phenomena are analyzed as a specific intellectual and public discourse in a particular era influenced the formation of both phenomena. Examples of national civilizing projects, their intellectual potential and influence on contemporary world politics are also considered. The echoes of colonialism and civilizing mission are visible in US and the EU doctrines of democracy promotion. Examining the evolution of approaches to democratization, the author finds the differences in strategic culture of the United States and the European Union: if the American establishment have a propensity to masculine practice of democracy promotion ("democratic enlargement", the project "Greater Middle East", etc.), and European leadership prefers feminine practices. In terms of the post-colonial feminism, this approach does not give these actors any special benefits, as it offers the ineffective governing strategy of the local population, not taking into account, and often denying the specific cultural environment of democracy promotion, paying more attention to institutional characteristics (lack of certain civil rights and freedoms, lack of transparency in the work of public authorities, etc.). The author notes that the current strategy of democracy promotion, though being more complex, creates the effect of "double discrimination", when both the local people and local women (imposing image of "a free and independent Western woman") feel that they are "colonized". Based on an analysis of the current state of democratization, the author proposes four possible scenarios for promoting democracy in the world.

democratization, post-colonial feminism, United States, European Union, colonialism, civilizing mission

1. Кант И. К вечному миру // Соч.: в 8 т. М., 1994. Т. 7. С. 5-56.

2. Кант И. Предполагаемое начало истории человечества /Пер. И.А.Шапиро // Родоначальники позитивизма. СПб., 1910. Вып. I. С. 15-28.

3. Кондорсе Ж. Эскиз исторической картины прогресса человеческого разума = Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progres de l'esprit humain. М., Либроком, 2011. 280 с.

4. Кулагин В. М. Мир в XXI веке: многополюсный баланс сил или глобальный Pax democratica (Гипотеза “демократического мира” в контексте альтернатив мирового развития). // Полис. Политические исследования. 2000. № 1. С. 23-39.

5. Сидоренко Л.В. Цивилизаторская миссия / Кафедра истории Нового и новейшего времени Института истории СПбГУ. URL: novist.history.spbu.ru/docs/NIR_Civilizatorskaya_Missiya.doc. (Проверенно 18.08.2016 г.).

6. Фергюсон Н. Империя: чем современный мир обязан Британии. М.: АСТ: CORPUS, 2014. 560 с.

7. Alessandri E. Democracy Promotion from Bush to Obama // EUSPRING - Working Paper No.1. April 2015. URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/irs/euspring/publications/us_dem_promotion_april15.pdf (Проверенно 18.08.2016 г.).

8. Carothers T. U.S. Democracy Promotion During and After Bush. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washington, DC, 2007. URL: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/democracy_promotion_after_bush_final.pdf (Проверенно 18.08.2016 г.).

9. De Caritat M.J. Reflections on Negro Slavery // The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History. ed. and trans. by Lynn Hunt. Boston: Bedford, 1996. Pp. 55-57.

10. Doyle M. Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs. Part 1 // Philosophy and Public Affairs. Summer 1983. Vol.12, no. 3. Pp.205-235.

11. Grosfoguel R. The Epistemic Decolonial Turn // Cultural Studies. March - May 2007. Vol. 21, no. 2-3. Pp. 211-223.

12. Judis J. Trotskyism to Anachronism: The Neoconservative Revolution // Foreign Affairs. July-August 1995. Pp. 123-129.

13. Kagan R. The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Knopf, 2008. 116 p.

14. Katrak K.H. Decolonizing Culture: Toward a Theory for Postcolonial Women’s Texts // Modern Fiction Studies. 1989. Vol. 35, no 1. Pp. 157-179.

15. Kristol W., Kagan R. Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy // Foreign Affairs. July-August 1996. Pp. 18-32.

16. Macleod C. Foucauldian Feminism: the Implications of Governmentality // Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. March 2002. Vol. 32, no. 1. Pp. 41-60.

17. Mohanty C.T. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses // Boundary. Spring-Fall 1984. Vol. 13, no. 1. Pp. 333-358.

18. Raley R. Macaulay’s Minute on Indian Education // History of English Studies. URL: http://oldsite.english.ucsb.edu/faculty/rraley/research/english/macaulay.htm (Проверенно 18.08.2016 г.).

19. Russet B. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, 1993. 192 p.

20. Søndergaard R. Bill Clinton’s Democratic Enlargement and the Securitization of Democracy Promotion // Academia. URL: http://www.academia.edu/12517120/Bill_Clinton_s_Democratic_Enlargement_and_the_Securitization_of_Democracy_Promotion (Проверенно 18.08.2016 г.).

21. Zielonka J. Europe's new civilizing missions: the EU's normative power discourse // Journal of Political Ideologies. 2013. Vol. 18, no. 1. Pp.35-55.