Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

THE VALUE CHAINS OF HIGH-TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS AS FACTOR OF FORMATION OF THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-6-51-125-135

Abstract

This article analyzes the value chain of high-tech products in Asia and the role of this phenomenon in the further consolidation of trade blocs and alliances in the region. The presence of these chains and their gradual transition from a vertically integrated model to a system of horizontal linkages and interdependence leads to the formation of mechanisms of economic de-facto integration (so-called regionalization process). The East Asian region has demonstrated unprecedented high rates of economic growth in recent decades. The countries are actively developing mechanisms of multilateral cooperation, involving partners from across the Asia-Pacific region. Particular features of a new regional architecture of economic relations are becoming more tangible, and the essential element of this architecture is the intra-regional integration. The author presents an assessment of further developments of the Regional comprehensive economic partnership (RCEP) using the structural-functional approach and analytical instruments of the international political economy, The creation of this trade block will help less advanced countries of ASEAN to accelerate economic growth and improve the conditions for integration into global value chains. For advanced economies, participation in the RCEP seems controversial, because production chains have well-established formats within the framework of ASEAN +. The political standoff between Washington and Beijing has an impact on dynamics of regional integration. The split among the East Asian countries was galvanized by the Trans-Pacific Partnership Project (TTP), because TPP has objectives that are very similar to those of RCEP (trade liberalization and economic integration). The author concludes that the extension of this partnership in the ASEAN countries can seriously complicate the operation RVEP and enhance the impact of political factors on economic cooperation. In this case, the value of production and supply chains of high-tech products will decline, which may affect the economic cooperation in the region as a whole.

About the Author

I. A. Safronova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

post-graduate student of School of International Affairs,

20 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Moscow, 101000



References

1. Mosiakov D.V. Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia v sovremennykh politicheskikh i ekonomicheskikh protsessakh Bol'shoi Vostochnoi Azii [South Eastern Asia in economic processes of the Great East Asia]. Iugo-Vostochnaia Aziia: aktual'nye problemy razvitiia - South Eastern Asia; current problems of development, 2006, no. 9, pp. 10 – 19. (In Russian).

2. Pakhomova L.F. Rasshirenie geograficheskikh granits torgovo-ekonomicheskikh blokov [Expansion of geographical boundaries of trade blocks]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik - The Russian foreign trade review, 2007, no. 2, pp. 35-48. (In Russian).

3. El'ianov A. Ia. Ekonomicheskaia modernizatsiia razvivaiushchikhsia stran v regional'nom razreze [Economic modernization of countries by regions]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2008, no. 6, pp. 19 – 29. (In Russian).

4. Stapran N. V. Prevrashchenie TTP v soglashenie “protiv Kitaia” znachitel'no snizhaet ego privlekatel'nost' [TPP loses attractiveness by turning against China]. kommersant.ru, 03.05.2016. Available at: http://kommersant.ru/doc/2978851 (Accessed: 01.05.2016). (In Russian).

5. Stapran N. V. TTP — Igra na operezhenie [TPP – who will be first?]. Russiancouncil.ru, 26.02.2016. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=7315#top-content (Accessed: 01.05.2016). (In Russian).

6. Shkoliar N. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo: progress ili ugroza? [Is TPP a progress or a threat?]. Interaffairs. ru, 18.04.2016. Available at: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/15106 (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

7. Das S.B. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: New paradigm or old wine in a new bottle? Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2015, no. 29 (2), pp. 68 – 84.

8. He F., Yang P. China’s Role in Asia’s Free Trade Agreements. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2015, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 416 – 424.

9. Jovanović M.N., Damnjanović J. Saving Multilateralism in a higgledy-piggledy Trading System. Journal of Economic Integration, 2015, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 29 – 65.

10. Kang Y.D. Development of Regionalism: New Criteria and Typology. Journal of Economic Integration, 2016, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 234 – 274.

11. Tow W.T. The United States and Asia in 2014: Reconciling Rebalancing and Strategic Constraints. Asian Survey, 2015, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 12 – 20.

12. Zhang Y., Shen M. Emergence of ASEAN, China and India and the Regional Architecture. China & World Economy, 2012, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 92 – 107.

13. D. Tran, A. Heal. A Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific: Potential Pathways to Implementation. Trade Insides, no. 4, 2014. 12 p. Unescap.org. Available at: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Trade%20Insights%20 -%20FTAAP%20-%20Issue%20No.%204.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

14. Statistical Appendix. Asian Economic Integration Report 2015, pp. 136 – 150. Asian Development Bank. Available at: https://aric.adb.org/pdf/aeir/AEIR2015_statappendix.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

15. Asian economic integration report 2015: How can special economic zones catalyze economic development? Str. 15 // Asian Development Bank. Rezhimdostupa:https://aric.adb.org/pdf/aeir/AEIR2015_part1.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016)

16. Chen J. TPP and RCEP: Boon or Bane for ASEAN? Asiafoundation.org. Available at: http://asiafoundation.org/2015/09/09/tpp-and-rcep-boon-or-bane-for-asean/ (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

17. Information Technology Agreement. WTO. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/inftec_e/inftec_e.htm (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

18. International Input-Output Tables, Asian International Input-Output Table. IDE-JETRO. Available at: http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Data/Io/ (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

19. Misa Okabe. Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Trade in East Asia // ERIA Discussion Paper Series, no. 1, January 2015. 48 p. Available at: http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2015-01.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

20. Prema-chandra Athukorala. Production Networks and Trade Patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or Globalization? Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, no. 56. August 2010. Asian Development Bank. 66 p. Available at: https://aric.adb.org/pdf/workingpaper/WP56_Trade_Patterns_in_East_Asia.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

21. Roadmap for an ASEAN Community 2009-2015 // ASEAN. Available at: http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/trade_policy/east_asia/dl/ASEANblueprint.pdf (Accessed: 01.05.2016).

22. TPP Full Text // US Trade, 2015. Available at: https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text (Accessed: 01.05.2016)

23. WTO members conclude landmark $1.3 trillion IT trade deal // WTO. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news15_e/ita_16dec15_e.htm (Accessed: 01.05.2016).


Review

For citations:


Safronova I.A. THE VALUE CHAINS OF HIGH-TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS AS FACTOR OF FORMATION OF THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016;(6(51)):125-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-6-51-125-135

Views: 1184


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)