THE US GLOBAL CITIES AS HUBS FOR FOREIGN TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-6-57-196-206
Abstract
Despite the acknowledgment of the global city concept and the importance of transnationalization processes in their formation, the debate regarding global city identification methods continues. The article stresses the need to change our approach in evaluating global cities by primarily looking at them as locales for foreign multinational corporations. By analyzing the location decisions of foreign TNCs included in the Forbes 2000 rankings two things become apparent: the “nodality” of US global cities and their hierarchical pattern. Moreover, the article recognizes the key role that Alpha global cities play by leading the country’s international business relations, examined through foreign TNCs. Using our methodology and data on foreign TNCs we defined five uneven groups of cities are defined in the study: city-hegemon New York, leading cities, heavyweight cities, middleweight cities and cities-outsider. The article defines some key factors that determine city’s attractiveness for foreign multinationals: its geo-economical power, functional specialization, location, historical and cultural ties, position on different sectoral markets. The study of US global cities as hubs for foreign transnational corporations seems to be especially useful for Russian cities, especially Moscow and St. Petersburgh, which aim to increase the attractiveness for foreign investment.
About the Authors
M. E. Pilka
Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Martin E. Pilka – PhD student, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Geography of World Economy.
1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119234.
N. A. Sluka
Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay A. Sluka – professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Geography of World Economy.
1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119234.
References
1. Gorod v konteksteglobal’nyh processov [City in the context of global processes]. Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Il’in, N.A. Sluka. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2011. 448 p. (In Russian)
2. Grechko E.A., Pil’ka M. EH., Sluka N.A. Aziatskie transnacional’nye korporacii v global’nyh gorodah SSHA [Asian transnational corporations in global US cities]. Aziya: demografiya – ehkonomika – integraciya. Ezhegodnik – 2014 – 2015 [Asia: Demography - Economics - Integration. Yearbook. 2014 - 2015]. Ed. L.V. Shkvarya. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2015. Pp. 117–130. (In Russian)
3. Pil’ka M.EH., Sluka N.A. Novejshiesdvigi v otraslevoj structure ehkonomiki Bol’shogo Los-Andzhelesa [The latest shifts in the industrial structure of the economy of Greater Los Angeles]. Geografiya, gradostroitel’stvo, arhitektura: sinteznaukipraktik [Geography, urban planning, architecture: the synthesis of sciences and practices]. Smolensk, Ojkumena Publ., 2013. Pp. 227–241. (In Russian)
4. Pil’ka M. EH., Sluka N.A. Razmeshchenie predstavitel’stv zarubezhnyh transnacional’nyh korporacij v global’nyh gorodah SSHA [Placement of representative offices of foreign transnational corporations in global US cities]. Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 5. Geogr, 2014, no. 4, pp. 75–82. (In Russian)
5. Sluka N.A. Geodemograficheskie fenomeny global’nyh gorodov [Geodemographic phenomena of global cities]. Smolensk, Ojkumena Publ., 2009. 317 p. (In Russian)
6. Sluka N.A. Gradocentricheskaya model’ mirovogo hozyajstva [Gradocentric model of the world economy]. Moscow, Press’Solo Publ., 2005. 168 p. (In Russian)
7. Sluka N. A., Grechko E. A., Pil’ka M.EH., Tkachenko T. H. Korporativnaya geografiya – propul’sivnoe napravlenie issledovanij v geografii mirovogo hozyajstva [Corporate geography - the propulsive direction of research in the geography of the world economy]. Social’no-ehkonomicheskaya geografiya: istoriya, teoriya, metody, praktika [Socio-economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice]. Ed. by A. P. Katrovskij, V.E.Shuvalov, T.I.YAs’kova. Ed. by V. E. Shuvalov. Smolensk, Universum Publ., 2016. Pp. 95–103. (In Russian)
8. Abrahamson M. Global Cities. Oxford University Press Publ., 2004. 192 p.
9. Abu-Lughod J.L. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: Americas’s Global cities. The University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 592 p.
10. Alderson A. S., Beckfield J., SpragueJones J. Intercity Relations and Globalisation: The Evolution of the Global Urban Hierarchy, 1981–2007. Urban Studies, 2010, no. 47(9), pp. 1899–1923.
11. Clark D. Urban World, Global City. London, Routledge Publ., 2003. 256 p.
12. Godfrey B.J., Zhou Y. Ranking World Cities: Multinational Corporations and the Global Urban Hierarchy. Urban Geography, 2013, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 268– 281.
13. Kratke S. How Manufacturing Industries Connect Cities Across the World: Extending Research on ‘Multiple Globalizations’. Global Networks, 2014, no. 14, vol. 2, pp. 121–147.
14. Liu X., Derudder B., Taylor P. J. Mapping the Evolution of Hierarchical and Regional Tendencies in the World City Network, 2000–2010. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2014, no. 43, pp. 51–66.
15. Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, New Jersey, 1991. 480 p.
16. Taylor P.J. Leading World Cities: Empirical Evaluations of Urban Nodes in Multiple Networks. Urban Studies, 2005, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1593–1608.
17. Taylor P.J. Specification of the World City Network. Geographical Analysis, 2001, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 181–194.
18. Taylor P.J. World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. Routledge Publ., 2004. 256 p.
19. Robinson J. Global and World Cities: A View from off the Map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2002, no. 26 (3), pp. 531–554.
20. Cities in a Globalizing World. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat). Gutenberg Press Publ., 2001. 344 p.
21. Verhetsel A., Sel S. World maritime cities: From which cities do container shipping companies make decisions? Transport Policy, 2009, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 240–250.
22. Walker R. A Requiem for Corporate Geography: New Directions in Industrial Organization, the Production of Place and Uneven Development. Georg. Ann, 1989, 71 B (1), pp. 43–68.
Review
For citations:
Pilka M.E., Sluka N.A. THE US GLOBAL CITIES AS HUBS FOR FOREIGN TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017;(6(57)):196-206. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-6-57-196-206
Views:
1378
Email this article 