Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Relations within «Triangle» USA – USSR – China at the End of Détente (1977–1980)

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-1-64-59-82

Abstract

The period of détente is usually associated with a decrease of confrontation in US-Soviet relations, the signing of agreements on the limitation of strategic weapons and anti-missile defense systems and the development of trade and economic relations, scientific and cultural exchanges. Strengthening security in Europe is considered another facet of détente. From this perspective détente is viewed as an alternative to the Cold War, and the end of détente is seen as a missed opportunity to develop international relations in the direction of a secure world with working mechanisms for harmonizing the interests of both the great powers and other countries.

The article deals with the history of relations in the triangle USA – USSR – China in 1977– 1980. The evolution of Washington’s foreign policy strategy and the inclusion to it policies towards the USSR and China in these years came at the background of pronounced Soviet– Chinese antagonism. In the first months there was no clear plan in the actions of the Carter administration, there was a sharp rivalry for influence on the president between individual political figures (first of all – S. Vance and Zb. Brzezinski). They proposed different scenarios of the development of the US–Soviet and US – China relations. Throughout the Carter presidency, the US used as much as possible the tensions between Moscow and Beijing. In the framework of tripartite relations, each of the sides consistently pursued its own course aimed at achieving unilateral benefits. There were no attempts to establish a trilateral dialogue with an agreed agenda. The processes of détente practically did not affect the complex of international problems that existed within the American – Soviet – Chinese triangle. Moreover, Washington’s use of the «Chinese card» prevented the reduction of tensions in American–Soviet relations and strengthened the Cold War logic and methods in the planning and implementation of US foreign policy.

About the Authors

T. A. Vorobyova
Vyatka State University
Russian Federation

Tamara A. Vorobyova – PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of General History and Political Sciences 

Moskovskaya str., 36, 610000, Kirov, Russia



V. T. Yungblud
Vyatka State University
Russian Federation

Valery T. Yungblud – Doctor of History, Professor, President 

Moskovskaya str., 36, 610000, Kirov, Russia

 



References

1. Barbashin I. V. Politicheskie otnosheniia SShA i KNR v otsenkakh amerikanskikh sinologov: konets 60-kh – 70-e gg. XX v. [Political relations between the United States and the People’s Republic of China in the estimates of American synologists: late 60s – 70s of XX century]. Abstract phd dis. Moscow, 2002. 21 p. (In Russian).

2. Bazhanov E.P. Dvizhushchie sily politiki SShA v otnoshenii Kitaia [Driving forces of the US policy towards China]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 238 p. (In Russian).

3. Bazhanov E.P. Vostochnyi ekspress s ostanovkami na Zapade [Eastern express with stops at West]. Moscow, VostokZapad, 2008. 616 p. (In Russian).

4. Bazhanov E.P. Kitai ot Sredinnoi imperii do sverkhderzhavy XXI veka [China: from Middle Empire to XXI century superpower]. Moscow, Izvestia, 2007. 351 p. (In Russian).

5. Bazhanov E.P. Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Topical problems of international relations]. In 3 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Nauchnaia Kniga Publ., 2002. 479 p. (In Russian).

6. Bovin A.E. XX vek kak zhizn’ [XX century as life]. Moscow, Zakharov, 2003. 654 p. (In Russian).

7. Bogaturov A.D. Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane [Great powers at Pacific ocean]. Moscow, Konvert Publ., 1997. 353 p. (In Russian).

8. Vorontsov V.B. Missionery i ikh nasledniki. Povoroty politiki SShA v otnoshenii Kitaia [Missionaries and their heirs: turns of US foreign policy towards China]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1986. 241 p. (In Russian).

9. Gati Ch. Strategiia i politika Zbigneva Bzhezinskogo [Brzezinski’s Strategy and Policy]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2017. 384 p. (In Russian).

10. Geidarov N.A. Strategicheskii «treugol’nik» Rossiia – Kitai – SShA: evraziiskii aspekt. [Strategic “Triangle” Russia – China – USA: Eurasian aspect], Phd diss. abstract. Moscow, 2008. 28 p. (In Russian).

11. Davis D.E., Trani E.P. Distorted mirrors. Americans and their relations with Russia and China in the 20th Century. University of Missouri, 2009. 496 p. (Russ. ed.: Devis D.E., Trani Iu.P. Krivye zerkala. SShA i ikh otnosheniia s Rossiei i Kitaem v XX veke. Moscow, Vagrius Publ., 2009. 912 p.).

12. Evseev S.A. «Strategicheskii treugol’nik»: Geopoliticheskie protivorechiia SShA – KNR – SSSR v Vostochnoi Azii v kontse 1960-kh – kontse 1970-kh gg. [“Strategical triangle”: geopolitical contradictions between USA, PRC and USSR in East Asia at late 1960–1970s]. Izvestiia Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 2: gumanitarnye nauki, 2007, vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 162–173. (In Russian).

13. Kapitsa M. S. KNR: tri desiatiletiia – tri politiki [PRC: three decades of policy]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1979. 576 p. (In Russian).

14. Kissinger H. On China. Penguin Books, 2012. 624 p. (Russ. ed.: Kissinger G. O Kitae. Moscow, AST Publ., 2002. 455 p.)

15. Lukin A.V. Medved’ nabliudaet za drakonom. Obraz Kitaia v Rossii v XVII–XXI vekakh [Bear watches Dragon. Image of China in Russia in XVII–XXI centuries]. Moscow, Vostok-Zapad, 2007. 598 p. (In Russian).

16. Neustadt R.E., May E.R. Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for DecisionMakers. Free Press, 1988. 352 p. (Russ. ed.: Noishtadt R., Mei E. Sovremennye razmyshleniia o pol’ze istorii dlia tekh, kto prinimaet resheniia. Moscow, Ad Marginem, 1999. 384 p.)

17. Ot miroporiadka imperii k imperskomu miroporiadku [From Empire’s world order to Imperial world order]. Ed. by Voitolovsky F.G. Moscow, Nauchno-obrazovatelnyy forum po mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam, 2005. 204 p. (In Russian)

18. Pechatnov V.O., Manykin A.S. Istoriia vneshnei politiki SShA [History of the US foreign policy]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ., 2012. 688 p. (In Russian).

19. Sistemnaia istoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v chetyrekh tomakh Sobytiia i dokumenty. 1918–2003. Sobytiia. 1945– 2003 [Systemic history of international relations in four volumes 1918–2003. Events and documents.]. Vol. 3. Events. 1945–2003. Moscow, Nauchno-obrazovatelnyy forum po mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam Publ., 2003. 718 p. (In Russian).

20. Sovremennyi Kitai v zarubezhnykh issledovaniiakh [Modern China in foreign researches]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979. 260 p. (In Russian).

21. Tsvetkov I. A. Politika SShA po otnosheniiu k taivan’skoi probleme, 1949– 1999 gg. [US Policy toward Taiwan problem. 1949–1999.]. Phd diss. Saint-Petersburg, 2000. 265 p. (In Russian).

22. Yungblud V.T., Vorobyova T.A. Sovetskokitaiskii raskol v amerikanskoi politike razriadki mezhdunarodnoi napriazhennosti (1968–1973 gg.) [The Soviet-Chinese split in the US Policy of détente (1968–1973)]. Vestnik NNGU, 2018, no. 1, pp. 47–58. (In Russian).

23. America and the Cold War, 1941–1991: a realist interpretation: in 2 vols. / Ed. by N. Graebner, R. Burns, J. Siracusa. Oxford, 2010. Vol. 2, ch. 13, pp. 393-440.

24. Chang J. U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan. Harvard, 2001. 40 p.

25. Coyer P. Congress, China and the Cold War: Domestic Politics and Sino-American Raprochement and Normalization, 1969–1980. PhD thesis. London, The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2014. 340 p.

26. Gaddis J. Strategies of Containment: a Critical Apraisal of American National Security Policy during the Cold War. New York, 2005. 503 p.

27. Gaddis J. The United States and the End of the Cold War: implications, reconsiderations, provocations. New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 1992. 301 p.

28. Garthoff R. Détente and confrontation. Washington, The Brookings Institution Publ., 1985. 1147 p.

29. Hsü I. China without Mao: the search for a new order. New York, Oxford University Press Publ., 1990. 212 p.

30. Johnson R. Congress and the Cold War. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2006. 346 p.

31. Keefer E. Harold Brown: Offsetting the Soviet Military Challenge, 1977–1981. Washington, Government Printing Office Publ., 2017. 815 p.

32. Leffler M. For the soul of mankind: the United States, the Soviet Union, and the Cold War. New York, Hill and Wang Publ., 2007. 586 p.

33. Leffler M. Safeguarding democratic capitalism: U.S. foreign policy and national security, 1920–2015. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 2017. 348 p.

34. McMahon R. The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction. New York, Oxford University Press, 2003. 185 p.

35. Mitchell N. The Cold War and Jimmy Carter. The Cambridge History of the Cold war. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 66–88. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521837217

36. Njølstad O. The collapse of superpower détente, 1975–1980. The Cambridge History of the Cold War, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 135–155. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521837217

37. Pollack J. The opening to America. The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 15. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2008. Pp. 402–472. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521243377

38. Sadako O. Normalization with China. A Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese Processes. Berkeley, University of California Institute of East Publ., 1990. 113 p.

39. Scalapino R. China and the Balance of Power. Foreign Affairs, 1974, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 349–385.

40. Sexton DuBois M. The Wages of Principle and Power: Cyrus R. Vance and the making of Foreign Policy in the Carter Administration. PhD dissertation. Washington, 2009. 451 p.

41. Stevenson R. The Rise and Fall of Détente. Relaxations of Tension in US–Soviet Relations, 1953–84. London, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 1985. 249 p.

42. Tyler P. The (Ab) Normalization of U.S.– Chinese Relations. Foreign Affairs, 1974, vol. 78, no 5, pp. 93–122.

43. Xiaoming Zhang China’s Decision to go to War with Vietnam. Journal of Cold War Studies, 2010, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3–29.

44. Yahuda M. The Significance of Tripolarity in China’s Policy Toward the United States Since 1972. China, the United States, and the Soviet Union: Tripolarity and Policy Making in the Gold War. New York, Routledge Publ., 2016. Pp. 11-38.

45. Yufan Hao. Dilemma and decision: an organizational perspective on American China policy making. Berkeley; California, Institute of East Asian Studies, 1997. 352 p.

46. Zhang Xiaoming. Deng Xiaoping and China’s Decision. Journal of Cold War Studies, 2010, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3–25.

47. Zubok V. Soviet foreign policy from détente to Gorbachev, 1975–1985. The Cambridge History of the Cold war, vol. 3. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2010. Pp. 89–111. DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521837217


Review

For citations:


Vorobyova T.A., Yungblud V.T. Relations within «Triangle» USA – USSR – China at the End of Détente (1977–1980). MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2019;(1(64)):59-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-1-64-59-82

Views: 3781


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)