Tradition and Innovation Dialectics in Russian Dissertation Culture

Today in Russia the system of the state scientific certification undergoes significant changes: the powers of federal executive authorities are delegated to the educational and scientific organizations. As a result, independence in the choice of mechanisms, orders and procedures of formation of dissertation committees and criteria of awarding academic degrees is allowed. At the same time reinterpretation of axiological bases of dissertation culture through overcoming the problems connected with authenticity and quality of dissertation researches, by increase in reputation responsibility of the organizations and scientists takes place. On May 31, 2019 it will be a year to the moment of transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of the state scientific certification. According to the model developed by the MGIMO University, awarding an academic degree comes by the results of the defense of a thesis at a meeting of the dissertation committee of 5 doctors of science, three of which are employees of the MGIMO University, and two are invited scientists from other organizations. Two of five are experts with publications in the scope of the research combining the role of a member of the dissertation committee and an official opponent. The result of the defense is politically variable: alongside with the possibility of taking the negative decision awarding an academic degree without completions of the text and also under the condition of insignificant and considerable completions of the text of a research is allowed. The lack of such opportunities in the practice of awarding academic degrees existing in the domestic dissertation culture excluding modification of the manuscript submitted to defence after holding a meeting of dissertation committees, as well as other defects of the historically developed model of awarding academic degrees, defined the fastest transition of the MGIMO University to a new model of certification. «MGIMO Review of International Relations» discussed the main milestones of formation and key problems of development of the domestic dissertation culture with P. Kasatkin and E. Antyukhova.

PhD culture, Dissertation Board, granting PhD, scientific assessment, PhD candidate, scientific opponent, nominated internal examiner, scientific publication

1. Belotserkovsky A.V. Prisuzhdeniye uchenykh stepeney v Rossii: zashchita ot kogo i ot chego [Obtaining Scholarly Degrees in Russia: Who and What to Defend from]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2013, no. 4, pp. 37-43. (In Russian)

2. Gurtov V.A., Nasadkin M.Y., Shchegoleva L.V. Garmonizatsiya sistem podgotovki i attestatsii nauchnykh i nauchno-pedagogicheskikh kadrov [The Harmonization of Training System and System of Certification of Scientific and ScientificPedagogical Personnel]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 2015, no. 5, pp. 60-68. (In Russian)

3. Zhavoronkova N.G. Shpakovskii Y.G. K voprosu o perekhode na novuyu model' attestatsii nauchnykh kadrov vysshey̆ kategorii [To the Issue of Transition to a New Model of Performance Assessment of Scientific Personnel of Superior Merit]. Aktual'nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2015, no. 12, pp. 87-95 (In Russian) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2015.61.12.087-095

4. Filippov V.M. Zadachi povysheniya nauchnogo urovnya i otvetstvennosti dissertatsionnykh sovetov [Tasks Increasing Scientific Level and Responsibility of Dissertation Councils]. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya, 2013, no. 5, pp. 4-10 (In Russian)

5. Filippov V.M, Savitskaya N. Prisuzhdeniye uchenykh stepeney – na sovesti dissertatsionnykh sovetov [The Awarding of Academic Degrees on the Conscience of Dissertation Councils]. Ekonomika obrazovaniya, 2014, no. 4. pp. 7-11. (In Russian)

6. Yakushev A.N. Proyekt Polozheniya ob uchenykh stepenyakh: kakim yemu neobkhodimo byt' v period modernizatsii? [A Draft ‘A Law of Scientific Degrees’: Which One It Should Be in a Period of Modernization?]. Pravo i obrazovaniye, 2013, no. 7, pp. 3-17. (In Russian)

7. Levin V.I. Nuzhen li Rossii VAK? [Does Russia Need VAK?]. Alma mater (Vestnik vysshey shkoly), 2015, no. 3, pp. 17-23. (In Russian)

8. Laptev V.V., Pisareva S.A., Tryapitsyna A.P. Uchenaya stepen' v Rossii: real'nost' i perspektivy [Scientific Degree in Russia: Reality and Prospects]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2013, no. 4, pp. 26-37. (In Russian)

9. Viculov S.F. Krizis sistemy attestatsii nauchnykh kadrov Rossii // Vooruzheniye i ekonomika [The Crisis in the Russian Certification of Scientific Personnel]. Vooruzheniye i ekonomika, 2014, no. 4 (29), pp. 93-99. (In Russian)

10. Shishkanova I.A., Pakhomov S.I., Gurtov V.A., Pennye I.V. Kriterii otsenki deyatel'nosti dissertatsionnykh sovetov dlya transformatsii natsional'noy̆ seti attestatsii kadrov VNK / I.A. Shishkanova, S.I. Pakhomov, V.A. Gurtov, I.V. Penniye [Criteria for Assessing the Activities of Dissertational Councils for the Transformation of the National Network of Personnel Certification of VNK]. Aktual'nyye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2017, no. 4 (77), pp. 208-216. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2017.77.4.208216