BRICS Countries in Political Consciousness of Russian Citizens

The article analyzes the Russian citizens’ perceptions of BRICS countries. The authors focus on the cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and symbolic aspects characterizing BRICS countries in political consciousness of the Russians as well as common stereotypes, intentions, and associations. Since the Russian Federation has political and economic interests in cooperation with the BRICS countries, it is important to study representations of Brazil, India, China and South Africa in Russian consciousness and identify the possibilities of their transformation. Proceeding from the results of qualitative politico-sociological (a series of focused interviews) and politico-psychological (projective tests) studies held in 2016-2018 the authors conclude that the emotional component prevails in the structure of Russian citizens’ perception about of Brazil, India, China and South Africa. The image of China appears to be the most complicated and multidimensional, with the key elements being the “thousand-year history”, the “great culture” and the recognition of the geopolitical power of this state. The images of India and Brazil among the Russians have a significantly more amorphous character, but at the same time hold a moderately positive emotional connotation. The image of South Africa is the most fragmented, devoid of stable emotional valence and bright associations. It is remarkable that the perception of the BRICS countries by the majority of respondents is primarily influenced by implicit factors which manifest in appeal to stereotypes and associations (India – cinema, Brazil – football, etc.). Dynamic factors, determined by political agenda, play a minor role forming the images of the BRICS countries. A noticeable feature of their representation among the Russians is the blurring of the “image of due” and “image of the future”, as well as the minimal role of the political component (with exception of China). Therefore, it is necessary to change the information policy for the countries studied. In order to enhance the understanding of significance and relevance of cooperation with the BRICS states among the Russian citizens, it seems to be necessary 1) to build a positive image of political relations with them; 2) to cement an image of a “partner” and an “ally” in mass media, both on a rational and an unconscious level of political perception.

BRICS, political consciousness, political perception, stereotypes, image of the country, implicit factors of perception, emotional profile of perception

1. Arapova E.Ia. Perspektivy ekonomicheskoi integratsii v formate BRIKS [Prospects for economic integration in the format of BRICS]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik ‒ Russian foreign economic bulletin. 2016, no. 2, pp. 42-44 (In Russian).

2. Buraev D.I., Baldanova R.A. Obrazy Rossii v Kitae (po materialam oprosa v gorode Guanchzhou) [Images of Russia in China (based on survey materials in the city of Guangzhou)]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ‒ Bulletin of the Buryat State University. 2015, no. 8, pp. 119-122 (In Russian).

3. Voskressenski A.D. Mirovye strategii velikikh derzhav i logika ob"edineniia stran BRIKS [World strategies of the great powers and the logic of integration of the BRICS countries]. Kitai na puti k vozrozhdeniiu. Ed. by S.G. Luzian. Moscow, 2014. Pp. 314-328 (In Russian).

4. Voskressenski A.D. Evoliutsiia politicheskoi sistemy i politicheskaia modernizatsiia KNR [The evolution of the political system and political modernization of the PRC]. Sravnitel'naia politika ‒ Comparative Politics. 2014, no. 1, pp. 120-138 (In Russian).

5. Galenovich Yu.M. Vzglyad na Rossiyu iz Kitaya. [A look at Russia from China]. Moscow, Time Publ., 2010. 304 р (In Russian).

6. Evgen'eva T.V., Usmanova Z.R. «Svoi» i «chuzhie»: obrazy zarubezhnykh gosudarstv v kontekste vospriiatiia Rossii ee grazhdanami [«Ours» and «aliens»: images of foreign countries in the context of the perception of Russia by its citizens]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 12: Politicheskie nauki ‒ Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12: Political Science, 2018, no. 2, pp. 57-75 (In Russian).

7. Zagorodnikova T.N., Kashin V.P., SHaumyan T.L. Obraz Rossii v obshchestvennom soznanii Indii: proshloe i nastoyashchee [The image of Russia in the public consciousness of India: past and present]. Moscow, Science Publ., 2011. 236 р. (In Russian).

8. Il'in I.V., Leonova O.G. Zarubezhnye podkhody k analizu fenomena transregionalizma BRIKS [Foreign approaches to the analysis of the phenomenon of BRICS trans-regionalism]. Sravnitelnaya Politica ‒ Comparative Politics Russia, 2017, no. 8, pp. 130-139 (In Russian).

9. Konkin A.A. Teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniia problemy sotrudnichestva stran BRIKS [Theoretical aspects of the study of the problem of cooperation of the BRICS countries]. Sravnitelnaya Politica ‒ Comparative Politics Russia, 2016, no. 7, pp. 22-30 (In Russian).

10. Li S. Obraz V.V. Putina v glazakh kitaytsev [The image of V.V. Putin in the eyes of the Chinese]. Ojkumena, 2009, no. 3, pp. 126-131 (In Russian).

11. Modernizatsiia i demokratizatsiia v stranakh BRIKS: sravnitel'nyi analiz. [Modernization and democratization in the BRICS countries: a comparative analysis]. Ed. by I.M. Busygina., I. Iu. Okunev. Moscow. 2015. 352 p. (In Russian).

12. Okuneva L.S. Braziliya: osobennosti demokraticheskogo proekta. Stranicy novejshej politicheskoj istorii latinoamerikanskogo giganta (1960-e gg.–2006 g.) [Brazil: features of the democratic project. Pages of the latest political history of the Latin American giant (1960-2006)]. Ed. by Okuneva L.S. Moscow, MGIMO-University, 2008. pp. 419-420 (In Russian).

13. Okuneva L.S. Prezidentskie vybory 2018 g. v Brazilii: burya i natisk [Brazil's 2018 presidential election: storm and onslaught]. Latinskaya Amerika - Latin America, 2018, no. 12, pp. 22-36 (In Russian).

14. Palitai I.S. Sredstva massovoi kommunikatsii kak faktor formirovaniia obraza strany [Mass media as a factor in shaping the image of the country]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia - Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2018, no. 41, pp. 150-158 (In Russian).

15. Politicheskoe povedenie: bessoznatel'nye mekhanizmy i ikh ratsionalizatsiia. Kruglyi stol zhurnala «Polis» i kafedry sotsiologii i psikhologii politiki fakul'teta politologii MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova [Political behavior: Unconscious mechanisms and their rationalization. Round Table of the Polis Journal and the Department of Sociology and Psychology of Politics, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University]. Shestopal E.B., Rakitianskii N.M., Smul'kina N.V., Palitai I.S., Evgen'eva T.V., Selezneva A.V., Titov V.V. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2013, no. 6, pp. 46-63 (In Russian).

16. Semenenko I.S. Natsiia, natsionalizm, natsional'naia identichnost': novye rakursy nauchnogo diskursa [Nation, nationalism, national identity: new perspectives of scientific discourse]. Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia ‒ World Economy and International Relations, 2015, no. 11, pp. 91-102 (In Russian).

17. Smirnova A.G. Obraz gosudarstva vo vneshnej politike i mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniyah: opyt sociologicheskogo issledovaniya [The image of the state in foreign policy and international relations: the experience of sociological research]. Ed. by Smirnova A.G. Saint Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, 2011. 239 р. (In Russian).

18. Ten N.V. Obraz Rossii v sovremennom Kitae (1991-2010). Ph.D. diss. Cand. of Sciense. [The image of Russia in modern China (1991-2010)]. Moscow, 2012.

19. Tihvinskij S.L. Vospriyatie v Kitae obraza Rossii [Perception in China of the image of Russia]. Moscow, Science Publ., 2008. 244 р. (In Russian).

20. Shestopal E.B. Proekt dlinoiu v chetvert' veka. Issledovanie obrazov vlasti i liderov v postsovetskoi Rossii (1993-2018) [A quarter-century project. Study of images of power and leaders in post-Soviet Russia (1993-2018)]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 9-20 (In Russian).

21. Shlykov P.V. Poisk transregional'nykh al'ternativ v Evrazii: fenomen MIKTA [Search for transregional alternatives in Eurasia: the phenomenon of MIKTA]. Comparative Politics Russia, 2017, no. 4, pp. 127-144 (In Russian).

22. Crigler A.N. The Psychology of Political Communication. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 1996. 262 p.

23. Feldman S. Values, Ideology, and Structure of Political Attitudes. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 2003. Pp. 477-508.

24. Greenstein F.J. Can Personality and Politics Be Studied Systematically. Political Psychology: Key Readings. Ed. by John T. Jost and J. Sidanius. New York: Taylor & Francis Books, 2004. Pp. 108-123.

25. Jolanda van der Noll, Henk Dekker. A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Urban Citizens’ Attitudes towards the EU, the United States, Russia and Japan. International Relations, 2016, vol. 30, no. 4.

26. Sedikides, C. and Brewer, M.B. Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 2001.