Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

WORLD EXPERIENCE OF GOVERNANCE REFORM

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-4-31-187-194

Abstract

The article is devoted to the changes in the configuration of the modern state. The author analyzes the world and domestic experience in the governance reform, determining the content, the main direction, reform technology. The article concerns the theoretical models that have become the basis of governance reform. An informative and functional aspects of governance reforms are considered in the context of modern approaches to the state functions. Considering the results of the governance reform, it should be taken into account that the implementation of these reforms was accompanied by a number of costs. In this regard, a number of experts, including experts from the World Bank, who prepared the materials for the Government Commission on lessons learned from reforms NPM, present restrained assessment of the reform results in various countries, noting their ambiguity and limited scope in relation to the objectives. "Undoubtedly, there are many examples of concrete improvements in certain specific services or in ministries and other organizations in each specific case. However, data on the overall impact of the reforms is very little ... Generally there is no accurate data on the actual results achieved by the majority of implemented reforms... In many cases ... there is difference of opinion about the results of the reform programs "[6, p. 74-75, 36, 40, 47, 78, 82-83, 92].

About the Author

O. V. Gaman Golutvina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), 76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia.
Russian Federation
Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor


References

1. Бюрократическая Россия. Наша проблема не в бюрократии, а в качестве управления ею // Коммерсант

2. №85 (3416). 16.05.2006 // URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/673546?isSearch=True

3. Вурстер Г. Модернизация госуправления и повышение квалификации госслужащих. - Реформы госу-

4. дарственного управления накануне третьего тысячелетия. М.: РАГС, 1999. С. 26.

5. Гаман-Голутвина О. В. Эрозия этики госслужбы // Полис. 2000. № 6. С.

6. Государственная политика и управление. Под ред. Сморгунова Л. В. Ч. 1-2. М.: Росспэн. 2006. 384 c.

7. Иноземцев В.Л. Призрак конкурентоспособности // Независимая газета. 11.04.2007. URL: http://www.

8. ng.ru/ideas/2007-04-11/10_economic.html

9. Мэннинг Н., Паркинсон Н. Реформа государственного управления. Международный опыт. М.: Весь

10. мир. 2003. 496 с.

11. Пичас Р. Законодательство о госслужбе в свете нового государственного менеджмента. - Реформы

12. государственного управления накануне третьего тысячелетия. М.: РАГС. 1999.

13. Политическая система США: актуальные измерения / Отв. ред. С.А. Червонная, В.С. Васильев. М.:Наука.

14. 55 с.

15. Райнхард К. Реформирование государственного управления. Концепция активизирующего госу-

16. дарства. - Реформы государственного управления накануне третьего тысячелетия. М.: РАГС. 1999.

17. Рогов С.М. Функции современного государства: вызовы для России. Ч. 1-3. // Свободная мысль. 2005.

18. № 7-9.

19. Соловьев А. И. Принятие политических решений. М.: МГУ. 2007..

20. Bozeman B., Straussman D. Public Management Strategies: Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness. San

21. Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1991.

22. Brym R., Gimpelson V. The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s

23. // Slavic Review. 2004. № 1.

24. Frederickson G., Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration

25. // Public Administration Review. 1996. Vol. 56. № 3.

26. Frederickson G. The repositioning of American public administration // PS: Political Science and Politics.

27. Vol. 32, no. 4. pp. 701-711.

28. Global Competitiveness Report, 2006 // URL: http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Global_Competitiveness_

29. Reports/Reports/gcr_2006/chapter_1_1.pdf;

30. Hood C., Jackson M., Administrative Argument. Aldershot: Darthmouth Publishing. 1991.

31. Hood C., Beyond the Public Bureaucracy State? Public Administration in the 1990s. London: Department

32. of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science. 1990

33. Hook J., President Putting “Big” Back in Government // Los Angeles Times. Feb. 8, 2005. Р. A1.

34. Nozick R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. N.Y.: Basic Books. 1974.

35. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public

36. Sector. NY: A Plume Book. 1992.

37. Peters G., Savoie D. Managing Incoherence: The Coordination and Empowerment Conundrum // Public

38. Administration Review. 1996. Vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 281–290.

39. Peters G., Models of Governance for the 1990s // D. Kettl and B. Milward (eds.) The State of Public Management.

40. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press. 1996.


Review

For citations:


Gaman Golutvina O.V. WORLD EXPERIENCE OF GOVERNANCE REFORM. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2013;(4(31)):187-194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-4-31-187-194

Views: 1087


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)