Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920
https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-52-86
Abstract
Gaining international recognition for the White Movement was the most important foreign policy task of the Russian non–Bolshevik diplomacy. The article traces the evolving discourse of career diplomats considering this issue at different stages of the civil war. It shows their deep patriotism, professionalism, and persistency in carrying out the task. However, when the allies did not share the slogans of the White Movement, the possibilities for finding common ground were very limited. At the first stage (summer-autumn 1918), diplomats were cautious about the claims for recognition of numerous Russian non–Bolshevik governments. In the second stage (1918 – 1919), the issue of recognition played a unique role – participation of Russian representatives in the peace conference, and therefore in determining the configuration of the post-war world, depended on its success. The resolve of the diplomats to defend the Russia’s national interests did not suit foreign powers, who did not share the movement's slogan about restoring a united and indivisible Russia, its power, and its position in the world. At the third stage (spring-summer 1920), diplomats, loosing hope for military victory of the White Movement in the civil war, withdrew from the direct involvement in seeking international recognition for the Movement. However, they provided all possible technical support to the head of the Department of External Relations of the Wrangel Government, Peter B. Struve, who assumed this mission. France's recognition of the Sevastopol authorities in the summer of 1920 was limited, did not involve active military assistance, and caused justified skepticism in diplomatic circles.
About the Author
E. M. Mironova
Institute of world history RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena M. Mironova – PhD (Historical science) Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Institute of world history
Russia,119334 Moscow, Leninsky Prosekt 32-A
References
1. Thompson J.M. 1966. Russia, Bolshevism and the Versailles Peace. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press. 429 р.
2. Tongour N.N. 1979. Diplomacy in Exile: Russian Emigres in Paris, 1918–1925. Ph.D Dissertation. Stanford University.
3. Ullman R.H. 1968. Anglo-Soviet Relations, 1917-1921: in 3 vols. Princeton, Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press. Vol. 2: Britain and the Russian Civil War. 396 р.
4. Abrikosov D.I. 2008. Sud'ba russkogo diplomata [The Fate of the Russian Diplomat]. Moscow: Publishing Center "Terra". (In Russian).
5. Chemakin A.A. 2020. Deyatel'nost' P.B. Struve kak ministra inostrannyh del pravitel'stva YUga Rossii (1920) [Activities of P.B. Struve as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Government of the South of Russia (1920)]. Nauchnyy dialog. No12. P. 362-377. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-362-377
6. Churchil’ W. 1932. Mirovoy krizis [The Global Crisis]. Moscow: State Military Publishing House. 328 p. (In Russian).
7. Cvetkov V.Zh. 2009. Beloe delo v Rossii. 1919 formirovanie i evolyuciya politicheskih struktur Belogo dvizheniya v Rossii. [White Business in Russia 1919 the Formation and Evolution of the Political Structures of the White Movement in Russia]. Moscow: Posev. 635 p. (In Russian).
8. Emcov G.N. 2002. Mezhdunarodnoe priznanie pravitel'stva A.V. Kolchaka (1918-1920 gg.): istoriko-pravovoi analiz [International Recognition of the Government of A.V. Kolchak (1918–1920): Historical and Legal Analysis]. Aktual'nye problemy teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava. Krasnoyarsk. Р. 63-75. (In Russian).
9. Ermakov V.P., Grishanin P.I. 2002. God 1920 v Krymu: «beloe delo» generala P.N. Vrangelya i pozicii pravitel’stva SSHA [Year 1920 in the Crimea: “White Matter” of General P.N. Wrangel and the Position of the US Government]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskoj i mirovoi istorii. Uchyonye zapiski. Vypusk I. Pyatigorsk. Р. 99–107. (In Russian).
10. Grishanin P.I., Ermakov V.P. 2006. P.N. Vrangel’ i Pol’sha: slozhnosti i protivorechiya vzaimootnoshenij [P.N. Wrangel and Poland: Complexities and contradictions of relations]. Krym, Vrangel’. 1920. Moscow: Sotsial'no-politicheskaya mysl'. P. 116-124. (In Russian).
11. Karlej M.D. 2017. Antibol’shevizm vo vneshnej politike Francii: pol’skij krizis 1920 g. [Anti-Bolshevism in French Foreign Policy: The Polish Crisis of 1920]. Zhurnal rossijskih i vostochnoevropejskih istoricheskih issledovaniy. Moscow. 3(10). P. 52-73. (In Russian).
12. Listikov S.V. 2009. Mir bez Rossii: predstavitel'stvo Belogo dvizheniya na Parizhskoi konferencii [World Without Russia: Representation of the White Movement at the Paris Conference]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 1(4). P. 15-29. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24833/20718160-2009-1-4-15-29
13. Listikov S.V. 2011. «Vil’sonovskie 14 punktov» i russkie nebol'shevistskie sily na parizhskoi mirnoi konferencii [Wilson's 14 Points" and Russian non-Bolshevik Forces at the Paris Peace Conference]. Zabytaya vojna i predannye geroi. Moscow: Veche. P. 129–158. (In Russian).
14. Mel'gunov S.P. 2004. Tragediya admirala Kolchaka [The Tragedy of Admiral Kolchak.] Book 1. Moscow. (In Russian).
15. Mikhailovsky G.N. 1992. Zapiski. Iz istorii rossijskogo vneshnepoliticheskogo vedomstva. 1914-1920 [Notes. From the History of the Russian Foreign Ministry. 1914-1920]. Books 1-2. Moscow. (In Russian)
16. Mironova E.M. 2013. Ot Pevcheskogo mosta do ulicy Grenel' 1917-1918 gg. [From Pevchesky Bridge to Grenelle Street 1917-1918]. Moscow: IVI RAN. 235 p. (In Russian).
17. Sergeev E.Yu. 2019. Bol'sheviki i anglichane. Sovetsko-britanskie otnosheniya, 1918–1924 gg: ot intervencii k priznaniyu. [Bolsheviks and British. Soviet-British Relations, 1918–1924: from Intervention to Recognition]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka. 831 р. (In Russian).
18. Shmelev A.V. 2017. Vneshnyaya politika pravitel'stva admirala Kolchaka. 1918-1919 [Foreign Policy of the Government of Admiral Kolchak. 1918–1919]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo Yevropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. 266 p. (In Russian).
19. Shtein B.E. 1949. "Russkij vopros" na Parizhskoj mirnoj konferencii (1919–1920 gg.) ["The Russian Question" at the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920)]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat. 463 p. (in Russian).
20. Smolin A.V. 2017. U zakrytyh dverej versal'skogo dvorca. Parizhskaya mirnaya konferenciya i russkaya diplomatiya v 1919 g. [At the Closed Doors of the Palace of Versailles. Paris Peace Conference and Russian Diplomacy in 1919]. Sankt-Petersburg: Nauka. 417 p. (In Russian).
21. Vrangel P.N. Vospominaniya generala barona Vrangelya [Memoirs of General Baron Wrangel]. 1992. Part 2. Moscow. (In Russian).
22. Zhanen M. 1930. Otryvki iz moego sibirskogo dnevnika. Kolchakovshchina. Iz belyh memuarov. [Excerpts from my Siberian Diary. Kolchakovshina. From the White Memoirs]. N.A. Kornatovsky (Ed.). Leningrad: Krasnaya Gazeta. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Mironova E.M. Russian Non-Bolshevik Diplomacy and the Issue of International Recognition of the White Movement in 1918-1920. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2023;16(1):52-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-1-88-52-86
Views:
698
Email this article 