Preview

MGIMO Review of International Relations

Advanced search

Revenue Formation Policy in the European Union Budget

https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-6-105-154-173

Abstract

The European Union’s post-2027 agenda raises a deceptively simple question: where will the money come from? The problem has acquired new urgency since the European Commission’s July 2025 proposal for the 2028–2034 Multiannual Financial Framework – envisaging a substantially larger envelope (around €2 trillion), greater budgetary flexibility, and additional revenue sources–has reopened distributional conflicts over who pays, who benefits, and under what rules. Moving beyond a purely economic reading, this article frames revenue reform as an institutional choice embedded in the EU’s quasi-federal system of multilevel economic governance and revisits the usefulness – and limits – of first-generation fiscal federalism for interpreting the Union’s evolving fiscal architecture.
The analysis is motivated by the fiscal afterlife of NextGenerationEU. Although conceived as an off-budget instrument, interest payments are charged to the EU’s current budget, while principal repayment–up to €338 billion linked to grants and the reinforcement of existing programs via externally assigned revenue–will enter the EU budget as a direct expenditure item from 2028 to 2058, sharpening the political necessity of reshaping the revenue side. 
Against this background, the article identifies the obstacles that continue to prevent a shift towards tax-based “own resources”, and it evaluates the plausibility of alternative trajectories, including a more explicit reliance on common debt. 
It does so through a structured examination of the EU’s existing own-resources system and the Commission’s successive reform packages (2021–2025), paying particular attention to proposals that seek to create more autonomous revenue streams–such as reallocating 30 per cent of EU ETS auction revenues and 75 per cent of CBAM proceeds to the EU level–while recognizing the political constraints that have repeatedly stalled agreement in the Council. Drawing on EU primary law and official documentation, alongside expert debates on EU taxing powers and fiscal integration, the article argues that–customs duties aside–the Union still lacks a comprehensive own-resources system that is genuinely autonomous from member-state budgets.

The core implication is that the EU’s future revenue strategy is likely to remain a politically contested mix of national contributions, tightly circumscribed “tax-like” resources linked to sectoral policies, and carefully designed borrowing instruments whose long-term stabilization remains uncertain.

About the Author

M. V. Strezhneva
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation

Marina V. Strezhneva – Doctor of Political Science, Professor, Principal Researcher (International Relations)

23 Profsoyuznaya St., Moscow 117997, Russian Federation



References

1. Antón R.G. 2023. Building up the EU Revenue Side: But What Is a Tax in EU Law? Politics and Governance. 11(4). P. 17–27. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v11i4.7176

2. Boadway R., Keen M. 1996. Efficiency and the Optimal Direction of Federal-State Transfers.

3. International Tax and Public Finance. №3. P. 137–155. DOI: 10.1007/BF00399907

4. Breuer J.L. 2023. Revisiting Early Fiscal Centralisation in the European Coal and Steel Community in Light of the EU’s Transfer Budget. Politics and Governance. 11(4). P. 28–39. DOI: 10.17645/ pag.v11i4.7252

5. Cannizzaro E. 2020. Neither Representation nor Taxation? Or, “Europe's Moment” – Part I

6. European Papers. 5(2). P. 703–706. DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/435

7. Caziero M. 2024. What Legal Basis for an EU Tax? Common Market Law Review. 61(6). P. 1527–1548. DOI: 10.54648/cola2024101.

8. Farri F. 2023. Between Form and Substance: At the Root of the Limits of the EU Taxing Powers. The Power to Tax in Europe. Ed. by J. Lindholm & A. Hultqvist. London: Bloomsbury Academic. P. 83–121.

9. Fuest C., Peichl A. 2012. European Fiscal Union: What Is It? Does It Work? And Are There Really No Alternatives? CESifo Forum. 13(1). P. 3–9. URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/forum112-focus1.pdf (accessed 05.12.2025).

10. Fuest C., Pisani-Ferry J. 2020. Financing the European Union: New Context, New Responses. Bruegel Policy Contribution. Issue 16. 18 p. URL: https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/financingeuropean-union-new-context-new-responses (accessed 05.12.2025).

11. Groenendijk N. 2023. Revenue Capacity of the EU: Taxes, Tax Sharing, and Resource Pooling.

12. Politics and Governance. 11(4). P. 6–16. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v11i4.7240

13. Hinarejos A., Schütze R. (eds.) 2023. EU Fiscal Federalism: Past, Present, Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 336 p. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198833284.001.0001

14. Iara A. 2015. Revenue for EMU: A Contribution to the Debate on Fiscal Union. Taxation Papers. №54. 24 p. URL: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-09/taxation_paper_54.pdf (accessed 15.07.2025).

15. Kowald K., Mazur S., Pari M., Peters T. Budgetary Outlook for the European Union 2025. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) Study. 82 p. URL: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2025)769563 (accessed 05.12.2025).

16. Le Cacheux J. 2005. European Budget: the Poisonous Budget Rebate Debate. Notre Europe Studies & Research. № 41. 46 p. URL: https://institutdelors.eu/content/uploads/2025/04/etud41en-3.pdf (accessed 05.12.2025).

17. Mohl P., Heinemann F., Osterloh, S. 2008. Who's Afraid of an EU Tax and Why? Revenue System Preferences in the European Parliament. ZEW Discussion Papers. №08-027. 36 p. URL: https:// www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24722/1/dp08027.pdf (accessed 05.12.2025).

18. Montoya L.A. 2023. Rethinking the EU Financial Architecture. Intereconomics. 58(6). P. 289–294. DOI: 10.2478/ie-2023-0060

19. Musgrave R.A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. A Study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill. 628 p.

20. Musgrave R.A. 1971. Economics of Fiscal Federalism. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business. 10(4). P. 3–13. URL: https://cooperative-individualism.org/musgrave-richard_economics-of-fiscal-federalism-1971-autumn.pdf (accessed 05.12.2025).

21. Reimer F., Guter-Sandu A., Haas A., Murau S. 2025. Schrödinger’s off-Balance-Sheet Fiscal Agency: the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Limits to incremental fiscal integration in Europe. Journal of European Integration. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2025.2491618

22. Saint-Amans P. 2024. Broader Boarder Taxes: a New Option for European Union Budget Resources. Bruegel Policy Brief. Issue 06. 12 p. URL: https://aei.pitt.edu/103849/1/PB_06_2024_0.pdf (accessed 05.12.2025).

23. Steinbach A. 2023. Tax and Debt Financing the EU. Intereconomics. 58(6). P. 311–314. URL: https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2023/number/6/article/tax-and-debt-financingthe-eu.html (accessed 05.12.2025).

24. Woźniakowski T. P. 2022. Fiscal Unions: Economic Integration in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192 p.

25. Peshina E.V., Strekalova A.A. 2016. Fiskal'nyj i byudzhetnyj federalizm: dve sistemy upravleniya publichnymi finansami [Fiscal and Budgetary Federalism: Two Systems for Public Financial Management]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: Science and Experience]. №11. P. 34–52. (In Russian)

26. Sergeev E.A. 2018. Fiskal'nyj federalizm v stranakh Vishegradskoj gruppy [Fiscal Federalism in Visegrad Group]. Sovremennaya Evropa. №7. P. 172–183. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope72018165178 (In Russian)

27. Sidorova E.A. 2021. Fiskal'naya integratsiya v Evropejskom soyuze [Fiscal Integration in the European Union]. Moscow: “Ves' Mir”. 200 p. (In Russian)

28. Sinicyna M.L. 2009. Federalizacija nalogov v uslovijah integracii [Federalization of Taxes in the Context of Integration]. Sovremennaja Evropa. №4. P. 85–97. (In Russian)

29. Peshina E.V., Strekalova A.A. 2016. Fiskal'nyj i byudzhetnyj federalizm: dve sistemy upravleniya publichnymi finansami [Fiscal and Budgetary Federalism: Two Systems for Public Financial Management]. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya [Financial Analytics: Science and Experience]. №11. P. 34–52. (In Russian)

30. Sergeev E.A. 2018. Fiskal'nyj federalizm v stranakh Vishegradskoj gruppy [Fiscal Federalism in Visegrad Group]. Sovremennaya Evropa. №7. P. 172–183. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope72018165178 (In Russian)

31. Sidorova E.A. 2021. Fiskal'naya integratsiya v Evropejskom soyuze [Fiscal Integration in the European Union]. Moscow: “Ves' Mir”. 200 p. (In Russian)

32. Sinicyna M.L. 2009. Federalizacija nalogov v uslovijah integracii [Federalization of Taxes in the Context of Integration]. Sovremennaja Evropa. №4. P. 85–97. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Strezhneva M.V. Revenue Formation Policy in the European Union Budget. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2025;18(6):154-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2025-6-105-154-173

Views: 342

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2071-8160 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9099 (Online)