Comparison of the Influence of the Chinese Lobby and the Israeli Lobby in the United States

The article is about how pro-Israel and pro-China interest groups try to lobby on the ground of Capitol, White House and executive branch. The study of the lobbying results is based on «General theory of action» T. Parsons. It is concluded that for lobbying interests the main point will be the representation of the interests in the political and public spaces and the creating of advocacy and lobbying infrastructure. The ability of the Israeli lobby to achieve the goal can be explained, firstly, by political inclusion in the decision-making process, and, secondly, by almost axiomatic representation Israel interests through the national interests of the United States. The Israeli lobby can be considered as the religious lobby. It can use the possibilities of Jewish religious organizations in grass root action. Also this gives the opportunity to avoid the requirements of the LDA. From the point of view of the theory of Talcott Parsons, the success of the Israeli lobby is the cause of the action of a large number of actors that may form in large groups. Another advantage of the Israeli lobby is the ability of its members to get relevant information about the current situation in different spheres of political life in the U.S. The objective of the present study was to reveal the ways in which China lobby succeeds. The influence of China lobby on decision-making process in the United States can be explained through strong economic ties between American corporations and the Chinese market. When lobbying China uses numerous Chinese Diaspora in many States, as well as trying to interest of the former high-ranking American officials, granting them special privileges for doing business in China. In comparison to the Israeli lobby, the Chinese lobby has weaknesses. Chinese interest groups are not included in the political system of the USA and this is the disadvantage of the Chinese way of lobbying. Unlike Israel lobby Chinese one is external. The interests of the chinese pressure groups do not coincide with American national interests. Their actors are not rooted in the American political system.

USA, lobbying, lobby, Israel, China, interest groups, Capitol, House of representatives, Senat, White House, representation of the interests, lobbying infrastructure

1. Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. М.: Академический Проект, 2000. 880 с.

2. AIPAC website [электронный источник] Режим доступа www.aipac.org/documents/whoweare.html#say (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

3. Alvarez L. The China Trade Wrangle: The Silicon Lobby, N.Y. Times, May 18, 2000.

4. American Israel Education Foundation website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.schusterman.org/programs/israel/american-israel-education-foundation (дата обращения 18.04.2015).

5. Bard M. Tenured or Tenuous: Defining the Role of Faculty in Supporting Israel on Campus. The Israel on Campus Coalition и The American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise. 2004. 11 p.

6. Bard M. The Water’s Edge And Beyond: Defining the Limits to Domestic Influence on the U.S. Middle East Policy, Transaction Publishers, 1991. 323 p.

7. Bolton D. Interview of «FoxNews» [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bUto8N-wGs (дата обращения 15.06 2015).

8. Blankfort J. Joe Biden: In Israel’s Service, «Counterpunch», Weekend Edition, 11-13 06.2010.

9. Chicago Jewish Star 29.08 - 11.09.2003, fundraising advertising.

10. Christians United for Israel website, [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.cufi.org/site/PageServer?pagename=about_executive_board (дата обращения 18.04.2015)

11. Clerk's Office U.S. House of Representatives website, [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://disclosures.house.gov/ld/ldsearch.aspx (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

12. CNN website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/04/01/pelosi.olympics (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

13. Cole J. The Patriot Act on Campus: Defending the university Post 9/11, Boston Review, Summer 2003.

14. Demirjian K. Harry Reid cheers Senate passage of Palestinian resolution. Las Vegas Sun, 29.06.2011.

15. Forsythe M. Businesses Look for an 'in' With Beijing. N.Y. Times, 04.05.2010.

16. Geguo huaren renkou zhuanji (The Chinese population of the World). Taiwan, 2005. 129 p.

17. Goldberg J. Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1996. 280 р.

18. Guttman N. Bush Set To Tap New Jewish Liaison, The Jewish Daily Forward, 29.11.2006.

19. Guttman N. J Street fails to win over key committee for Presidents Conference membership, Haaretz, 06.09.2009.

20. Harris M. Chicagoan to head pro-Israel group - Chicago Tribune», 21.05.2010.

21. «Jewish Daily Forward» 31.12.2004, Leaders Fear Probe Will Force Pro-Israel Lobby To File as ‘Foreign Agent’; Israeli Envoy’s Bid To Head U.S. Group Torpedoed, [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://forward.com/articles/4064/leaders-fear-probe-will-force-pro-israel-lobby-to/#ixzz2bmaCGJYO (дата обращения 11.10.2014).

22. Kampeas R. Campus Oversight Passes Senate as Review Effort Scores a Victory, JTA, 22.11.2005.

23. Markay L. Clinton Climate Plan Winners Include Supporters’ Clients, Employers, The Washington Free Beacon, 28.07.2015.

24. Lehene R. Government and Business: American Political Economy in Comparative Perspective, CQ Press, 2012.

25. Lobe J. U.S.: Right-Wing Israel Lobby Riding High in Election Run-Up, Inter Press Service (IPS) 23.06.2010.

26. Mozgovaya N. Focus U.S.A / Whatever happens, Israel can always count on U.S. evangelicals, Haaretz, 22.06.2010.

27. Open Secrets website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/lookup.php (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

28. Oren M. Power, Faith, and Fantasy: America in the Middle East 1776 to the Present. New York: W. W. Norton, 2007. 604 p.

29. Reid T., Cornwell S. China launches lobbying push on currency bill, REUTERS, 12.10.2011.

30. Scherer M. The Pro-Israel Lobby's Plan to Storm Congress, TIME, 22.03.2010.

31. Secretary of the Senate, Office of Public Records, Lobbying report website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=7BAAB9C4-5097-430E-8439-24BE5CF95722&filingTypeID=60 (дата обращения 18.04.2015); http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=B358017E-2B72-45B5-BB37-7C4FE5B79E9A&filingTypeID=60 (дата обращения 18.04. 2015)

32. Secretary of the Senate, Office of Public Records, Lobbying report website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=F7A9DDDD-2F35-4674-8333-0B5BC89B1BC1&filingTypeID=78 (дата обращения 18.04.2015)

33. Thrush G. Pelosi still hammers China. POLITICO, 18.03.2009

34. Toomey website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.toomey.senate.gov/?p=issue&id=35 (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

35. Traub J. New Israel Lobby. The New York Times, 13.09.2009.

36. US Census Bureau website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.census.gov/newsroom/facts-for-features/2015/cb15-ff07.html (дата обращения 18.04.2015).

37. U.S. - China Business Council website [электронный источник] Режим доступа https://www.uschina.org/reports/us-exports/national (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

38. U.S. Department of Justice website [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.fara.gov/ (дата обращения 18.04. 2015).

39. U.S. groups urge Congress reject China currency bill. Reuters, 24.06.2011 [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/24/businesspro-us-usa-china-currencyidUSTRE75N5JE20110624 (дата обращения 24.09.2015)

40. White House to name new Jewish liaison. THE TIMES OF ISRAEL, 10.07.2013 [электронный источник] Режим доступа http://www.timesofisrael.com/white-house-to-name-new-liaison-to-jewish-community/(дата обращения 24.09.2015)