The Soviet and Russian Energy Industry as Objects of Western Sanctions: Political Rivalry or Economic Competition

Since the late 1940s Western countries have regularly used sanctions, embargoes and other similar instruments to counter the development of the Soviet and, after 1991, the Russian energy industry. The author tries to answer two research questions: what provokes such a policy of the West: political rivalry or economic competition? Has the West changed its attitude to the Russian energy industry after the end of the Cold war? The first part of the study covers the years of the Cold war; the second part is devoted to the period following the collapse of the USSR. The article deals with generic approaches of Western countries to the Soviet and Russian energy industry, as well as their stances on major oil and gas pipelines, including the «Druzhba» (or the «Friendship») oil pipeline, the Soyuz gas pipeline, The «Urengoy – Pomary – Uzhhorod» (or the West-Siberian) gas pipeline, the Nord Stream 1,2 gas pipelines. The author came to the following conclusions. The main inspirer of sanctions and other restrictive measures of the West against the Soviet and Russian energy industry has always been the United States of America. The core motive of such behavior has been political rivalry, although in certain periods (for example, in the 1950s-1960s, 2010-ies) the United States may also be driven by economic competition or the desire to ensure the interests of its energy companies. Western European countries have often been in solidarity with the American actions against the Soviet or Russian energy complex. However, when their strategic interests are affected (for example, in case of construction of the Urengoy – Pomary – Uzhgorod and Nord stream 2 gas pipelines), they can resist the dictates of Washington. This is due both to pressure from Western European business interested in cooperation with the USSR or Russia in the energy field, and a strong desire of Western European countries to diversify oil and gas supplies from the Middle East and to solve some other energy problems, for instance, to mitigate transit risks associated with Ukraine. Overall, the end of the Cold war has not radically changed the policy of the West towards the Russian energy industry.

energy policy, oil, gas, sanctions, USSR, Russia, USA, EU, Germany, Nord Stream, Ukraine

1. Brzeziński Z. Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska [The Grand Chessboard]. Moscow, AST, 2018. 384 p. (In Russian).

2. Borovsky Y. Mezhdunarodnoe sopernichestvo: teoreticheskie i lingvisticheskie aspekty [International Rivalry: Theoretical and Linguistic Aspects]. Mezdunarodnye otnoshenia, 2018, no.3, pp. 65 – 72. (In Russian).

3. Borovsky Y. Tsenovye voiny na mirovom rynke neſti [Price wars in global oil markets]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy – Internationals trends, 2017, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 176–185 (In Russian).

4. Yergin D. Dobycha. Vsemyrnaya istoria borby za neſt, dengi i vlast [The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power]. Moscow, Alpina Publisher, 2018. 956 p. (In Russian).

5. Sakwa R. Syrievoi sector Rossii: ekonomika kontrolya i politika renty [Russia’s Commodities: Economics of Control and Politics of Rent]. Neprikosnovenny zapas, 2010, vol. 74, no. 6. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2010/6/sa9-pr.html (accessed 12.06.2019).

6. Sidorova E. Energetika Rossii pod sanktsiimi Zapada [The Russian energy industry under western sanctions]. Internationals trends, 2016, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 143–155

7. Adelman M. Genie out of the Bottle: World Oil since 1970. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2008. 376 p.

8. Bradshaw M. The Kremlin, National Champions and the International Oil Companies: The Political Economy of the Russian Oil and Gas Industry. Geopolitics of Energy, 2009, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2-14.

9. Bremmer I., Johnston R. The Rise and Fall of Resource Nationalism. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 2009, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 149–158. https://doi. org/10.1080/00396330902860884

10. Cooper P.J., Vargas C.M. Sustainable Development in Crisis Conditions: Challenges of War, Terrorism, and Civil Disorder. Langham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. 362 p.

11. Diehl P., Goertz G. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 2001. 336 p.

12. Geopolitics of Energy and Energy Security, ed. by C.P. Fernandes, T.F. Rodrigues. Lisbon, Instituto da Defesa Nacional, 2017. 148 p.

13. Giuli M. Nord Stream 2: Rule no more, but still divide (Issue paper). European policy center, 2018, 25 June. 26 p. URL: https://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_8613_nordstream2.pdf?doc_ id=2010 (accessed 12.06.2019).

14. Goldthau A. Assessing Nord Stream 2: regulation, geopolitics & energy security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe & the UK. London, EUCERS, 2016. 39 p.

15. Gustafson T. Wheel of Fortune: The Battle for Oil and Power in Russia. Cambridge, Belknap Press, 2012. 672 p.

16. Pascual C. The New Geopolitics of Energy. Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, 2015, September. 33 p.

17. Pee R. Democracy Promotion, National Security and Strategy: Foreign Policy under the Reagan Administration. NY, Routledge, 2015. 229 p.

18. Russland will Deutschland destabilisieren. Internationale Politik, 2019, März-April, s. 26-29 (In German).

19. Service R. The End of the Cold War: 1985-1991. NY, Public Affairs, 2015. 688 p.

20. Silverstone P.H. The Export Control Act of 1949: Extraterritorial Enforcement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1959, vol. 107, pp. 331–362. URL: https:// scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7036&context=penn_ law_review (accessed 12.06.2019)

21. Sixsmith M. Putin's Oil: The Yukos Affair and the Struggle for Russia. NY, Bloomsbury Academic, 2010. 320 p.